From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755987Ab1IGRv3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:51:29 -0400 Received: from gw1.transmode.se ([195.58.98.146]:44862 "EHLO gw1.transmode.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755512Ab1IGRv1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Sep 2011 13:51:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <035901cc6d7b$77065350$6512f9f0$@systemfabricworks.com> References: <20110831213729.395283830@systemfabricworks.com> <4E5EB5F4.6010105@systemfabricworks.com> <20110902165047.6aaec238.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20110903114403.027a9563c86eeaf1c0e4e80b@canb.auug.org.au> <20110907005013.e96fb5acd9f4b7c06ee70972@canb.auug.org.au> <20110906123851.dc4de9f5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <035901cc6d7b$77065350$6512f9f0$@systemfabricworks.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 05/10] crc32-misc-cleanup.diff X-KeepSent: 1BC44A31:C055969E-C1257904:0061969E; type=4; name=$KeepSent To: "Bob Pearson" Cc: "'Andrew Morton'" , fzago@systemfabricworks.com, "'George Spelvin'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Stephen Rothwell'" X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.2FP3 Aug 10, 2010 Message-ID: From: Joakim Tjernlund Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 19:51:24 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on mail1/Transmode(Release 8.5.2FP3|July 10, 2011) at 09/07/2011 19:51:25 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Bob Pearson" wrote on 2011/09/07 18:30:31: > > > > > The list of needed changes based on recent comments I am aware of are: > > - put back in a couple of header files per Andrew > > - fix the summary phrases to conform to coding standards per Andrew > > - add signed off by for Joakim to patch 04/10 per Joakim > > - fix bug in patch 06/10 noted in my email by passing bits as a parameter > to > > crc32_body > Adding three additional changes: > - update macro per Joakim > - shorter generator code per George > - remove unneeded local_irq_disable per Andrew > Any more? There was more in my comments. Don't you scroll through the whole reply when you read it? Especially this one: "BTW, is the 64 CRC bits on 32 bits BE arch bug fixed?" > > Can we finish crc32 before we start boiling the ocean with crc32c, crc16 > etc.? I am happy to pitch in on those but I would like to see something > actually get done. I actually need this one. Yes, lets get this cleared first. The other stuff depends on this.