From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shirley Ma Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:11:00 -0700 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Cc: davem@redhat.com, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, mashirle@us.ibm.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Return-path: To: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Yes. Yoshifuji is right.The timeStamp should be -- hundredths of seconds since an epoch TimeTicks ::= [APPLICATION 3] IMPLICIT INTEGER (0..4294967295) I will modify the patch, and resubmit it against Linux-2.6.0-test6-bk8 again. Thanks Shirley Ma IBM Linux Technology Center 15300 SW Koll Parkway Beaverton, OR 97006-6063 Phone: (503) 578-7638 FAX: (503) 578-3228 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 @oss.sgi.com on 10/07/2003 04:35:18 AM Sent by: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com To: davem@redhat.com cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, mashirle@us.ltcfwd.linux.ibm.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implementation for IPv6 MIB:ipv6AddressTable In article <20031007041246.13aa0391.davem@redhat.com> (at Tue, 7 Oct 2003 04:12:46 -0700), "David S. Miller" says: > On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 15:16:20 +0400 (MSD) > kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote: > > > Actually, this does not depend on our implementation. If people implement > > a MIB, required precision of these times is prescribed in the rfc. > > And this is definitely not jiffies. > > Right, Shirley what is it? The type is TimeTicks (RFC2578) via TimeStamp (RFC2579). Thus, uint32_t counter in 1/100 sec. unit. --yoshfuji