From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kazuhiro.fujita.jg@renesas.com (Kazuhiro Fujita) Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 05:52:23 +0000 Subject: [cip-dev] about branch of meta-debian in cip-core/deby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: To: cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org List-Id: cip-dev.lists.cip-project.org Hello Hayashi-san, > -----Original Message----- > From: kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 10:52 AM > To: Kazuhiro Fujita ; > daniel.sangorrin at toshiba.co.jp; nobuhiro.iwamatsu at miraclelinux.com > Cc: jan.kiszka at siemens.com; cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org > Subject: RE: about branch of meta-debian in cip-core/deby > > Hello Fujita-san, > CC: Jan > > > In case the morty branch will be replaced by the master, current users > > will automatically switch to the master without knowing the change? > No, user can not automatically migrate from morty to master without > knowing the changes > because several specifications about recipe development has been deferent > between them. > > Therefore, regarding deby repository, it would be better to provide > branches Agreed. > "morty" and "master" as follows: > Current New > master(poky:morty-based) => morty > - => master(poky:master-based) > jethro => remove? (no longer maintained in meta- > debian) > > I would like to know if we need to the common branch name in cip-core. > For example: cip-core-v1(4.4+Debian8/9?), cip-core-v2(4.19+Debian10), ... Common branch name like cip-core-xx will help many users to understand which branch they should use. However, it may not clear CIP has decided or not that each kernel version sticks to specific version of the other OSSs. Some people around me say that OSSs included in cip-core will keep these versions and maintained by CIP. For example, they believe openssl 1.0.1t will be used when kernel 4.4-cip is running. This may not right assumption. Is there any material explaining the update policy of cip-core? > > If the both tiny(deby) and generic profile(isar) are based on the same > CIP kernel and Debian versions, we can use such common branch name above. > If not, or no benefit for users to use the common branch name, > I would like to simply use "morty" and "master" in deby repository. Using different version for tiny and generic may be confusing. In my opinion, tiny should be the subset of generic profile. Kind regards, Fujita > > Kind regards, > Kazu > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kazuhiro Fujita [mailto:kazuhiro.fujita.jg at renesas.com] > > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2019 11:39 AM > > To: hayashi kazuhiro(? ?? ????????) > > ; sangorrin daniel(????? ???? > > ????????) ; > > nobuhiro.iwamatsu at miraclelinux.com > > Cc: cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org > > Subject: RE: about branch of meta-debian in cip-core/deby > > > > Hello Hayashi-san, > > > > > Should we keep the morty branch and add contents of master to another > > cip- > > > core branch, or just replace the morty by the master? > > > > In case the morty branch will be replaced by the master, current users > > will automatically switch to the master without knowing the change? > > > > Regards, > > Fujita > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org > > > > project.org> On Behalf Of kazuhiro3.hayashi at toshiba.co.jp > > > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 7:09 PM > > > To: daniel.sangorrin at toshiba.co.jp; nobuhiro.iwamatsu at miraclelinux.com > > > Cc: cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org > > > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] about branch of meta-debian in cip-core/deby > > > > > > Iwamatsu-san, Daniel, > > > > > > > > It provides debian 8 packages in OE/recipe. Is there any reason to > > > > > choose morty/debian 8? > > > In my understanding, this is the initial repository which was created > > > when the master branch (Debian 10 based) didn't exist yet. > > > We are planning to update it to the current master branch. > > > > > > I have another question about how to do that. > > > Should we keep the morty branch and add contents of master to another > > cip- > > > core branch, > > > or just replace the morty by the master? > > > > > > Regards, > > > Kazu > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org > > > > [mailto:cip-dev-bounces at lists.cip-project.org] On Behalf Of > > > > daniel.sangorrin at toshiba.co.jp > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019 2:52 PM > > > > To: nobuhiro.iwamatsu at miraclelinux.com > > > > Cc: cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org > > > > Subject: Re: [cip-dev] about branch of meta-debian in cip-core/deby > > > > > > > > Iwamatsu-san, > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2019 4:38 PM > > > > > To: sangorrin daniel(????? ???? ????????) > > > > > > > > > Cc: cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org > > > > > Subject: about branch of meta-debian in cip-core/deby > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Daniel. > > > > > > > > > > I have a question about about branch of meta-debian in cip- > core/deby. > > > > > > > > > > The meta-debian branch used by cip-core/deby is morty. > > > > > It provides debian 8 packages in OE/recipe. Is there any reason to > > > > > choose morty/debian 8? > > > > > Is the reason why the mata-debian master branch is still in > > > development? > > > > > Will you/we switch to the master branch when Debian 10 is > released? > > > > > > > > Yes, that's correct. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Daniel > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > cip-dev mailing list > > > > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org > > > > https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > > > cip-dev mailing list > > > cip-dev at lists.cip-project.org > > > https://lists.cip-project.org/mailman/listinfo/cip-dev