All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Qiang1" <qiang1.zhang@intel.com>
To: Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	RCU <rcu@vger.kernel.org>,
	"quic_neeraju@quicinc.com" <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Oleksiy Avramchenko" <oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] Reduce synchronize_rcu() waiting time
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 00:14:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR11MB5880E8E099868473028944D6DA889@PH0PR11MB5880.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZCHWxD7D9N7v115O@pc636>


> > > From: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 6:28 PM [...]
> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Reduce synchronize_rcu() waiting time
> > > 
> > > A call to a synchronize_rcu() can be expensive from time point of view.
> > > Different workloads can be affected by this especially the ones 
> > > which use this API in its time critical sections.
> > > 
> > 
> > This is interesting and meaningful research. ;-)
> > 
> > > For example in case of NOCB scenario the wakeme_after_rcu() 
> > > callback invocation depends on where in a nocb-list it is located. 
> > > Below is an example when it was the last out of ~3600 callbacks:
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Can it be implemented separately as follows?  it seems that the code 
> is simpler (only personal opinion)  😊.
> 
> But I didn't test whether this reduce synchronize_rcu() waiting time
> 
> +static void rcu_poll_wait_gp(struct rcu_tasks *rtp) {
> +       unsigned long gp_snap;
> +
> +       gp_snap = start_poll_synchronize_rcu();
> +       while (!poll_state_synchronize_rcu(gp_snap))
> +               schedule_timeout_idle(1); }
> +
> +void call_rcu_poll(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func); 
> +DEFINE_RCU_TASKS(rcu_poll, rcu_poll_wait_gp, call_rcu_poll,
> +                 "RCU Poll");
> +void call_rcu_poll(struct rcu_head *rhp, rcu_callback_t func) {
> +       call_rcu_tasks_generic(rhp, func, &rcu_poll); } 
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(call_rcu_poll);
> +
> +void synchronize_rcu_poll(void)
> +{
> +       synchronize_rcu_tasks_generic(&rcu_poll);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(synchronize_rcu_poll);
> +
> +static int __init rcu_spawn_poll_kthread(void) {
> +       cblist_init_generic(&rcu_poll);
> +       rcu_poll.gp_sleep = HZ / 10;
> +       rcu_spawn_tasks_kthread_generic(&rcu_poll);
> +       return 0;
> +}
> 
>Uh.. I am working on v2 of original patch where i need to add a Kconfig parameter. You are inventing a new API :)

Looking forward to V2 😊.

Thanks
Zqiang

>
>--
>Uladzislau Rezki

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-28  0:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-21 10:27 [PATCH 1/1] Reduce synchronize_rcu() waiting time Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)
2023-03-21 14:03 ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2023-03-21 15:15   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-03-22  1:49     ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2023-03-22  6:50       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-03-22 11:21         ` Zhuo, Qiuxu
2023-03-27 11:21     ` Zhang, Qiang1
2023-03-27 17:47       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-03-28  0:14         ` Zhang, Qiang1 [this message]
2023-03-27 21:23       ` Joel Fernandes
2023-03-28  0:12         ` Zhang, Qiang1
2023-03-28  1:06       ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-28  1:32         ` Zhang, Qiang1
2023-03-28  1:59           ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-28  2:29         ` Joel Fernandes
2023-03-28 15:26           ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-28 22:14             ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 15:11               ` Joel Fernandes
2023-03-30 19:01                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 15:09             ` Joel Fernandes
2023-03-30 15:43               ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-03-30 18:58                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 19:18                   ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-03-30 21:16                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-31 10:55                       ` Uladzislau Rezki
2023-03-31 18:39                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-30 18:57               ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-27 21:48     ` Steven Rostedt
2023-03-27 21:50       ` Steven Rostedt
2023-03-28  1:28         ` Zhuo, Qiuxu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=PH0PR11MB5880E8E099868473028944D6DA889@PH0PR11MB5880.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=qiang1.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleksiy.avramchenko@sony.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=qiuxu.zhuo@intel.com \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.