From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:55:30 +0100 (BST) Received: from delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl ([IPv6:::ffff:213.192.72.1]:54990 "EHLO delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:55:28 +0100 Received: from localhost by delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA27010; Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:55:26 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: delta.ds2.pg.gda.pl: macro owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:55:26 +0200 (MET DST) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Ralf Baechle cc: Keith M Wesolowski , "Kevin D. Kissell" , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: CVS Update@-mips.org: linux In-Reply-To: <20030730031631.GD7366@linux-mips.org> Message-ID: Organization: Technical University of Gdansk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 2929 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > I hope `uname -m' will continue to report the correct architecture and > > that ARCH will be correctly handled (i.e. "mips" selecting a 32-bit build > > and "mips64" a 64-bit one) -- have you considered this? > > Not intend to change the behaviour of uname. It actually changed in CVS, > for now consider that a bug ... OK, I will. > We should consider changing the behaviour though. A machine type of > mips64 broke lots of software. Of course that was all 32-bit softare but > it raises the question if returning mips64 is really a good idea? Yes it is. It is the only way to check if the kernel is 32-bit or 64-bit and config.guess needs it for guessing the canonical system name. That, plus checking the default ld emulation lets it (or will let, once written) select what is the proper default native configuration: mips{,el}-unknown-linux-gnu, mips64{,el}-unknown-linux-gnu-abin32 or mips64{,el}-unknown-linux-gnu-abi64. > As for choosing a 32-bit vs. 64-bit kernel, that's now a menu point and can > be choosen like every other config option. Well, I liked the `make "ARCH=mips64"' way, but I suppose I'll have to live with your change, sigh... -- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +