From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S270299AbRHHDpT>; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 23:45:19 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S270300AbRHHDpI>; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 23:45:08 -0400
Received: from blackhole.compendium-tech.com ([64.156.208.74]:50074 "EHLO
	sol.compendium-tech.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S270299AbRHHDpF>; Tue, 7 Aug 2001 23:45:05 -0400
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 20:45:15 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Dr. Kelsey Hudson" <kernel@blackhole.compendium-tech.com>
X-X-Sender: <kernel@sol.compendium-tech.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: is this a bug?
In-Reply-To: <3B70AEC5.5FE97ACC@pobox.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108072041400.23797-100000@sol.compendium-tech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, J Sloan wrote:

> "Dr. Kelsey Hudson" wrote:

> > It's a bug in that screwed up compiler redhat shipped with 7.1.

> Oh please, not this FUD again.....

Call it what you wish -- But, if I see something break when using a
certain compiler option versus another compiler option that does not
cause a break, chances are it's a bug in the compiler. After all, the
Athlon support *is* a new feature, is it not?

I don't even know why I bothered replying. Don't feed the trolls... Gotta
watch for those signs....

 Kelsey Hudson                                           khudson@ctica.com
 Software Engineer
 Compendium Technologies, Inc                               (619) 725-0771
---------------------------------------------------------------------------