From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Kent Subject: Re: [NFS] RE: multiple servers per automount Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 11:23:51 +0800 (WST) Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Message-ID: References: <6AB920CC10586340BE1674976E0A991D5955FC@slexch2.sugarland.unocal.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <6AB920CC10586340BE1674976E0A991D5955FC@slexch2.sugarland.unocal.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Ogden, Aaron A." Cc: autofs mailing list , nfs@lists.sourceforge.net, Mike Waychison On Fri, 10 Oct 2003, Ogden, Aaron A. wrote: > > > > So this would indicate that even if there is a device system that can > > increase the number of unnamed devices that subsystems like NFS cannot > > handle this many mounts. > > Maybe. I'm not 100% certain though. Currently I am holding steady at > 710 active mounts, I am going to write a little script to mount more in > small increments, ie. read a list of ~1000 mountpoints from /home, mount > a few of them, check the filesystems, and repeat... this way I will know > exactly where things break down. Interesting. If you can edge it up then it's probably not an available port restriction. There may be more than one issue at work here. -- ,-._|\ Ian Kent / \ Perth, Western Australia *_.--._/ E-mail: raven@themaw.net v Web: http://themaw.net/