From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 00:31:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 00:31:07 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:39953 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 4 Aug 2001 00:30:50 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 01:30:55 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Mike Castle Cc: Subject: Re: ext3-2.4-0.9.4 In-Reply-To: <20010803212605.K437@thune.mrc-home.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Mike Castle wrote: > On Fri, Aug 03, 2001 at 11:50:23PM -0400, Patrick J. LoPresti wrote: > > Matthias Andree writes: > > > > > > http://cr.yp.to/qmail/faq/reliability.html > > > > ...which is consistent. Qmail is assuming that the link() is > > synchronous, as it was back in the "Good Old Days" of stock FFS. > > Which, from my reading of the archives, even BSD folk say is a "Bad > Thing(tm)." ...which is consistent, looking at the other things qmail does in strange ways ;) Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)