From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S270591AbRHIUgx>; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 16:36:53 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S270582AbRHIUgn>; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 16:36:43 -0400
Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:41744 "HELO
	perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S270581AbRHIUga>; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 16:36:30 -0400
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 17:36:12 -0300 (BRST)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
X-X-Sender: <riel@duckman.distro.conectiva>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>, Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How/when to send patches - (was  Re: [PATCH] one of $BIGNUM
 devfs races)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108082230480.7127-100000@penguin.transmeta.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0108091732380.1439-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> Re-sending is always the right thing to do.

So many VM patches, so little time ;)

I need to automate this ...

cheers,

Rik
--
IA64: a worthy successor to the i860.

		http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/	http://distro.conectiva.com/