All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Cc: davem@redhat.com, <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:50:49 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307170940280.1348-100000@netcore.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307170003.EAA12843@dub.inr.ac.ru>

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> > > > What happens when you do "ping6 3FFE:FFFF:A:B::1" ?
> 
> ping did, does and will work and I do not understand what you want
> to say or ask. Do you want to know how it works?
> 
> Well, IPv6 stack looks up the address in routing tables, finds the route,
> sees that it is on-link, sends NDISC, receiver replies, we create a frame
> and send the echo request. To continue? :-)

(Sorry, it seems I've caused a lot of confusion in some parts of this 
thread by typoeing link-local address when I used link-layer address.. 
sorry)

So, assume you have 3FFE:FFFF:A:B::/64 prefix on link.  On a host on that 
link, you've manually configured the next-hop to be the router on that 
link, 3FFE:FFFF:A:B::1.

The procedure to obtain the knowledge on where to send packets whose 
next-hop is 3FFE:FFFF:A:B::1 seems quite simple, similar to ping6.

As to obtaining the link-*local* address, there are several procedures 
none of which I would recomment.  Checking the source address of a ND 
packet (e.g. in the ping6 example above), or using a protocol like ICMP 
name information queries (draft-ietf-ipngwg-icmp-name-lookups-10.txt).

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-17  6:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20030710.214551.08349572.davem@redhat.com>
2003-07-14 23:49 ` 2.4.21+ - IPv6 over IPv4 tunneling b0rked kuznet
2003-07-15  6:14   ` Pekka Savola
2003-07-15 14:46     ` kuznet
2003-07-15 17:29       ` Pekka Savola
2003-07-15 23:19         ` kuznet
2003-07-16  6:03           ` Pekka Savola
2003-07-17  0:03             ` kuznet
2003-07-17  6:50               ` Pekka Savola [this message]
2003-07-10 15:43 CaT
2003-07-10 15:55 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-07-10 15:58   ` CaT
2003-07-10 16:08   ` Pekka Savola
2003-07-13 14:49     ` Anand Kumria
2003-07-13 16:23       ` Pekka Savola
2003-07-10 19:57   ` Mika Penttilä
2003-07-10 16:27 ` Mika Liljeberg
2003-07-10 23:39   ` CaT
2003-07-11  0:04     ` Mika Liljeberg
2003-07-11  1:49       ` Andre Tomt
2003-07-11  2:03         ` Mika Liljeberg
2003-07-11  4:51         ` Pekka Savola
2003-07-11  5:20           ` Mika Liljeberg
2003-07-11  5:22             ` Pekka Savola
2003-07-11  5:39               ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-07-11  8:46                 ` Pekka Savola
2003-07-11  9:04                   ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-07-11  9:39                     ` Mika Penttilä
2003-07-11  9:39                       ` Mika Penttilä
2003-07-11 10:03                     ` Pekka Savola
2003-07-11 10:47                       ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-07-11 10:47                         ` Pekka Savola
2003-07-11 10:59                           ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-07-11 10:59                             ` Pekka Savola
2003-07-11 11:03                               ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2003-07-11 11:04                                 ` Pekka Savola
2003-07-11 11:36               ` Mika Liljeberg
2003-07-11 11:48                 ` Pekka Savola
2003-07-11 12:09                   ` Mika Liljeberg
2003-07-11 12:48                     ` Mika Penttilä
2003-07-11 13:38                       ` Mika Liljeberg
2003-07-11 14:27                         ` Mika Penttilä
2003-07-11 14:32                           ` Mika Liljeberg
2003-07-11 15:16                             ` Mika Penttilä

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0307170940280.1348-100000@netcore.fi \
    --to=pekkas@netcore.fi \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.