From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269902AbTGSMQi (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:16:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270036AbTGSMQi (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:16:38 -0400 Received: from tomts14.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.35]:20978 "EHLO tomts14-srv.bellnexxia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269902AbTGSMQg (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:16:36 -0400 Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 08:30:20 -0400 (EDT) From: "Robert P. J. Day" X-X-Sender: rpjday@localhost.localdomain To: Alasdair Kergon cc: Linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: LVM/device mapper support for 2.6.0-test1? In-Reply-To: <20030718183027.A6328@uk.sistina.com> Message-ID: References: <20030718183027.A6328@uk.sistina.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Alasdair Kergon wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:55:02PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > any pointers to LVM[2] support for 2.6? that last message > > for LVM and device mapper referred only to 2.4. thanks. > > You should use the patches joe submitted to l-k recently together with > the userspace library and tools in the tarballs on the ftp site. > > Snapshots and pvmove are still being ported to 2.6. i just built (successfully, i think :-) LVM2 under 2.6.0-test1-ac2, and without testing it yet, i noticed that there is, in fact, a "pvmove" command. does that mean that all the pvmove functionality is there now? or what does it mean? rday