From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270660AbTGNS6s (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:58:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270709AbTGNS6r (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:58:47 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:57995 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270660AbTGNS6p (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Jul 2003 14:58:45 -0400 Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 16:11:02 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@freak.distro.conectiva To: ajoshi@kernel.crashing.org Cc: lkml , benh@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: radeonfb patch for 2.4.22... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 ajoshi@kernel.crashing.org wrote: > > > On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > > Ah really? I though that his changes were not merged in your 0.1.8 patch. > > > > So can I just revert his patch and accept your instead that all of his > > stuff is in ? Whoaa, great. > > Here is an xcept from ChangeLong section of the driver from the patch I > sent you: > > + * 2003-04-12 Mac PowerBook sleep fixes, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, > + * 0.1.8 > > I agree this isn't very descriptive of this other fixes and I can change > that, but a lot of his Mac changes have been merged in, but apparently > nobody has taken the time to actually look at that patch. If there are > things that are missing then I asked him to tell me, which he has not so I > assume there are none. Ben, can you submit a patch against Ani's latest driver which adds all your fixes, please? > > Ani, I received complains that you were not accepting patches from Ben. He > > needs that code in. > > This is not true, see the above. Also, its hard to "accept patches" from > people if you do NOT recieve any patches from them! Ben's style is to get > the maintainers of drivers to go around and search for his personal tree > and do their own diffs from that tree, instead of him sending a patch to > the maintainer. I'vee asked Ben to submit his code against yours 1 > > > > If so then please let me know, so I don't waste anymore of my time on > > > this driver and let someone else play these silly games and maintain it. > > > > I prefer playing no silly games in the 2.4 stable series, as I've been > > trying to do so far. If you had accepted Ben's changes in the first place > > I wouldnt need to apply his patch. > > I did accept most all of his changes when this patch was made (originally > I sent it May 12, which you did not merge into 2.4.21, probably because I > sent it during the RC stange, but after that you lost the patch ?). Yes I lost it. > Since that time, I assume Ben has made some other changes, which I have > not recieved any word about. > > Please don't accuse people of not accpeting patches when that is simply > not true, as it can be easily said for you too. I received complains from people I trust. I'm sorry for accusing you of something you have not made. Now lets have a 0.1.8 + "ok with you" ben changes patch ? I will revert Ben patch and apply that instead once we have it. Seems everyone will be happy that way, right?