From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br>
To: Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
Cc: mason@suse.com, andrea@suse.de, riel@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maillist@jg555.com
Subject: Re: Bug Report: 2.4.22-pre5: BUG in page_alloc (fwd)
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2003 14:23:53 -0300 (BRT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.55L.0307211422010.26736@freak.distro.conectiva> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030721170517.1dd1f910.skraw@ithnet.com>
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003 10:49:06 +0200
> Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 11:14:15 -0300 (BRT)
> > Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo@conectiva.com.br> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I have just started stress testing a 8way OSDL box to see if I can
> > > reproduce the problem. I'm using pre6+axboes BH_Sync patch.
> > >
> > > I'm running 50 dbench clients on aic7xxx (ext2) and 50 dbench clients on
> > > DAC960 (ext3). Lets see what happens.
> > >
> > > After lunch I'll keep looking at the oopses. During the morning I only had
> > > time to setup the OSDL box and start the tests.
> >
> > Hello Marcelo,
> >
> > have you seen anything in your tests? My box just froze again after 3 days
> > during NFS action. This was with pre6, I am switching over to pre7.
>
> I managed to freeze the pre7 box within these few hours. There was no nfs
> involved, only tar-to-tape.
You had NMI on, correct? Sysrq doesnt work, correct?
> I switched back to 2.4.21 to see if it is still stable. Is there a
> possibility that the i/o-scheduler has another flaw somewhere (just like
> during mount previously) ...
It might be a problem in the IO scheduler, yes.
Lets isolate the problems: If 2.4.21 doenst lockup, try 2.4.22-pre7
without drivers/block/ll_rw_blk{.c,.h} changes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-21 18:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.55L.0307150859130.5146@freak.distro.conectiva>
[not found] ` <1058297936.4016.86.camel@tiny.suse.com>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.55L.0307160836270.30825@freak.distro.conectiva>
[not found] ` <20030718112758.1da7ab03.skraw@ithnet.com>
2003-07-18 12:23 ` Bug Report: 2.4.22-pre5: BUG in page_alloc (fwd) Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-18 12:50 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-07-18 14:14 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-18 15:13 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-07-21 8:49 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-07-21 11:51 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-21 15:05 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-07-21 16:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-21 19:24 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-07-21 19:40 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-21 20:12 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-07-21 21:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2003-07-21 17:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2003-07-21 19:09 ` Stephan von Krawczynski
2003-07-18 17:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.55L.0307211422010.26736@freak.distro.conectiva \
--to=marcelo@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maillist@jg555.com \
--cc=mason@suse.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=skraw@ithnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.