From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S270925AbTGVQtE (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 12:49:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S270926AbTGVQtE (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 12:49:04 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:24202 "EHLO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S270925AbTGVQtB (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Jul 2003 12:49:01 -0400 Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 14:00:25 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@freak.distro.conectiva To: Jim Gifford Cc: Andrea Arcangeli , lkml Subject: Re: 2.4.22-pre5 deadlock In-Reply-To: <012d01c35066$2c56d400$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> Message-ID: References: <042801c3472c$f4539f80$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> <06e301c347c7$2a779590$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> <002b01c347e9$36a04110$f300a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> <001801c348a0$9dab91e0$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> <008701c34a29$caabb0f0$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> <20030719172103.GA1971@x30.local> <018101c34f4d$430d5850$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> <005a01c34fed$fea51120$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> <012d01c35066$2c56d400$3400a8c0@W2RZ8L4S02> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 22 Jul 2003, Jim Gifford wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marcelo Tosatti" > To: "Jim Gifford" > Cc: "Andrea Arcangeli" ; "lkml" > > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 4:53 AM > Subject: Re: 2.4.22-pre5 deadlock > > > > > > > > On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Jim Gifford wrote: > > > > > > Lets wait and see what happens without the iptables and dazuko > modules. > > > > > > > Marcelo, > > > -pre7 seems to be working ok. Do you want me to enable the dazuko > thing > > > again to see if it's the cause, or do you want me to wait a little > longer to > > > see what happens. > > > > Jim, > > > > I prefer if you leave -pre7 running for a while to confirm its stable. > > > > > > > top - 08:29:37 up 2 days, 13:41, 2 users, load average: 2.33, 2.12, 2.03 > Tasks: 109 total, 3 running, 106 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu0 : 0.3% user, 3.9% system, 95.8% nice, 0.0% idle > Cpu1 : 1.3% user, 0.6% system, 98.1% nice, 0.0% idle > Mem: 1033672k total, 639904k used, 393768k free, 160764k buffers > Swap: 265060k total, 0k used, 265060k free, 187444k cached > > Do you want me to do something intensive. I have a compile that I can do > that takes over 8 hours. Jim, I guess most of us is already convinced that the lockups were caused by the non-stock code. How long it usually took to lockup before?