From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: (as177) Add class_device_unregister_wait() and platform_device_unregister_wait() to the driver model core
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:42:09 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0401230939170.2151@home.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0401231135400.856-100000@ida.rowland.org>
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> Since I haven't seen any progress towards implementing the
> class_device_unregister_wait() and platform_device_unregister_wait()
> functions, here is my attempt.
So why would this not deadlock?
The reason we don't wait on things like this is that it's basically
impossible not to deadlock.
There are damn good reasons why the kernel uses reference counting
everywhere. Any other approach is broken.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-23 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-23 16:58 PATCH: (as177) Add class_device_unregister_wait() and platform_device_unregister_wait() to the driver model core Alan Stern
2004-01-23 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2004-01-23 18:03 ` Alan Stern
2004-01-23 18:10 ` viro
2004-01-23 18:18 ` Greg KH
2004-01-23 18:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-23 18:31 ` Greg KH
2004-01-23 18:11 ` Greg KH
2004-01-23 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-23 18:27 ` Greg KH
2004-01-25 17:32 ` Alan Stern
2004-01-25 19:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-01-25 20:21 ` viro
2004-01-27 6:51 ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-27 13:56 ` Roman Zippel
2004-01-27 23:29 ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-28 2:36 ` Roman Zippel
2004-01-28 3:54 ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-25 23:12 ` Steve Youngs
2004-01-26 3:22 ` Adam Kropelin
2004-01-26 5:06 ` Steve Youngs
2004-01-26 5:21 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-26 5:55 ` Steve Youngs
2004-01-26 6:25 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-01-26 8:48 ` Helge Hafting
2004-01-26 15:50 ` Adam Kropelin
2004-01-26 16:22 ` Roman Zippel
2004-01-27 19:32 ` Russell King
2004-01-27 20:28 ` Greg KH
2004-01-27 20:29 ` Greg KH
2004-01-28 2:03 ` Roman Zippel
2004-01-28 2:17 ` viro
2004-01-28 2:53 ` Roman Zippel
2004-01-27 6:41 ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-23 19:45 ` viro
2004-01-26 5:50 ` Rusty Russell
2004-01-26 15:51 ` Alan Stern
2004-01-27 22:55 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.58.0401230939170.2151@home.osdl.org \
--to=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.