From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Sun, 28 Nov 2004 02:01:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pollux.ds.pg.gda.pl ([IPv6:::ffff:153.19.208.7]:46596 "EHLO pollux.ds.pg.gda.pl") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 02:01:52 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pollux.ds.pg.gda.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F92CE1CC2; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 03:01:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from pollux.ds.pg.gda.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pollux [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 19954-04; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 03:01:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from piorun.ds.pg.gda.pl (piorun.ds.pg.gda.pl [153.19.208.8]) by pollux.ds.pg.gda.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BADE1CB6; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 03:01:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl (macro@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl [153.19.208.6]) by piorun.ds.pg.gda.pl (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iAS21wP2011649; Sun, 28 Nov 2004 03:01:59 +0100 Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 02:01:44 +0000 (GMT) From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" To: Ralf Baechle Cc: sjhill@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: CVS Update@-mips.org: linux In-Reply-To: <20041127231543.GA14252@linux-mips.org> Message-ID: References: <20041127061929Z8224786-1751+2584@linux-mips.org> <20041127231543.GA14252@linux-mips.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.80/605/Wed Nov 24 15:09:47 2004 clamav-milter version 0.80j on piorun.ds.pg.gda.pl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at pollux.ds.pg.gda.pl Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 6473 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: macro@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Sun, 28 Nov 2004, Ralf Baechle wrote: > We're already printing way too much stuff and this is a not very useful > message so why not removing the whole thing for good ... This is useful for reliability verification. See the thread starting at: "http://oss.sgi.com/projects/netdev/archive/2004-11/msg00475.html". The setting should also be user controllable, but for now people should at least know whether it's in effect or not. Anyone is free to bump their console/syslog loglevel to get rid of less important messages to suit there preferences. And INFO, which is what the message uses, is the lowest level for stuff for non-developers. Maciej