From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput.
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 18:09:17 +0100 (MET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0701021807500.4001@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <459A73CB.8010901@rtr.ca>
On Jan 2 2007 10:01, Mark Lord wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>>
>> > But surely one of (not sure which) sync+async or async+sync may also
>> > be okay?
>> > Or would it?
>>
>> Async merge to sync request should be ok. But I wonder what happens with
>> hdparm, since it seems to trigger one of these tests. Very puzzling.
>> I'll dive in and take a look.
>
> The code (written 10 years ago) isn't the best in the world,
> and will be redone entirely for hdparm-7.0 this year.
>
> But right now, it essentially does this:
>
> loop:
> seek( to sector zero );
> read( 2MBytes );
> repeat loop for 3 seconds
Well for pure reading speed, I already use dd_rescue -d /dev/hda /dev/null
Gives the same as hdparm -t when acting on uncached data.
-`J'
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-02 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-20 13:37 PATA -- pata_amd on 2.6.19 fails to IDENTIFY my DVD-ROM Rene Herman
2006-12-27 7:19 ` Tejun Heo
2006-12-27 17:50 ` Rene Herman
2006-12-28 2:24 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-01 22:46 ` 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput Rene Herman
2007-01-01 22:56 ` Rene Herman
2007-01-01 23:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-01-01 23:28 ` Mark Lord
2007-01-02 8:34 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-02 15:01 ` Mark Lord
2007-01-02 16:53 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-02 17:35 ` Mark Lord
2007-01-02 17:53 ` Tejun Heo
2007-01-02 18:10 ` Mark Lord
2007-01-02 21:50 ` ATA_12 support for libata/ATAPI devices Mark Lord
2007-01-02 17:09 ` Jan Engelhardt [this message]
2007-01-02 5:36 ` 2.6.20-rc2+: CFQ halving disk throughput Andrew Morton
2007-01-02 8:44 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-02 10:24 ` Rene Herman
2007-01-02 11:57 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-02 12:10 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-02 15:12 ` Mark Lord
2007-01-02 15:14 ` Jens Axboe
2007-01-02 15:40 ` Mark Lord
2007-01-02 15:45 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0701021807500.4001@yvahk01.tjqt.qr \
--to=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
--cc=rene.herman@gmail.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.