All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Tomas M <tomas@slax.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: max_loop limit
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 02:34:04 +0100 (MET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0703230232320.9555@yvahk01.tjqt.qr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070322144210.73dfaf83.dada1@cosmosbay.com>


On Mar 22 2007 14:42, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>Instead of using :
>
>static struct loop_device *loop_dev;
>loop_dev = kmalloc(max_loop * sizeof(struct loop_device));
>
>Switch to :
>
>static struct loop_device **loop_dev;
>loop_dev = kmalloc(max_loop * sizeof(void *));
>if (!loop_dev) rollback...
>for (i = 0 ; i < max_loop ; i++) {
>	loop_dev[i] = kmalloc(sizeof(struct loop_device));
>	if (!loop_dev[i]) rollback...
>}
>
>This time, you would be limited to 16384 loop devices on x86_64, 32768 on i386
>:)

Oh noes. Please use a linked list (kmalloc cope = perfect) if you really need
loads of loopdevs. Sorta

 struct loopdev {
    struct list_head lh;
    int lo_number;
 };

to keep the /dev/loop%d number consistent across loopdev removal.
Maybe it's better to even use an rbtree (linked list does not scale to it).


Jan
-- 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-03-23  1:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-03-22  7:57 max_loop limit Tomas M
2007-03-22 11:00 ` markus reichelt
2007-03-22 11:37   ` Tomas M
2007-03-22 13:42     ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-22 13:42       ` Jens Axboe
2007-03-22 13:52         ` Eric Dumazet
2007-03-22 13:54           ` Jens Axboe
2007-03-22 14:11             ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-03-22 15:22               ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-03-22 16:09               ` Pádraig Brady
2007-03-28 23:34                 ` Karel Zak
     [not found]             ` <20070322151826.c1421851.dada1@cosmosbay.com>
     [not found]               ` <20070322142306.GU19922@kernel.dk>
     [not found]                 ` <20070322153603.1f5d442d.dada1@cosmosbay.com>
2007-03-22 15:31                   ` max_loop limit - paid job offer Tomas M
2007-03-22 14:33         ` max_loop limit Al Viro
2007-03-22 19:51           ` Olivier Galibert
2007-03-22 14:25       ` Tomas M
2007-03-23  1:34       ` Jan Engelhardt [this message]
2007-03-23 23:26         ` [PATCH] " Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-25  0:17           ` Ken Chen
2007-03-25  0:29           ` Ken Chen
2007-03-25  8:40           ` Tomas M
2007-03-28 23:41             ` Karel Zak
2007-03-29  3:54           ` Kyle Moffett
2007-03-29  4:16             ` [PATCH] max_loop limit, t2 Jan Engelhardt
2007-03-29  8:38               ` [PATCH] max_loop limit, loop.c final working version Tomas M
2007-03-29 14:16     ` max_loop limit Bill Davidsen
2007-03-22 13:53 devzero
2007-03-22 23:23 devzero
2007-03-23  8:59 ` Tomas M
2007-03-22 23:37 roland
2007-03-29 14:20 ` Bill Davidsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.61.0703230232320.9555@yvahk01.tjqt.qr \
    --to=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
    --cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tomas@slax.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.