From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: MinGW binary installer available Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:10:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <45C9E470.7030609@xs4all.nl> <45C9EB54.3040406@xs4all.nl> <45C9F184.1060300@xs4all.nl> <45CA06E7.3050704@xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jan Nieuwenhuizen To: Han-Wen Nienhuys X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Feb 07 18:27:52 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HEqJE-0006YD-7E for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 07 Feb 2007 18:10:16 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161389AbXBGRKJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:10:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161402AbXBGRKI (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:10:08 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:49283 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1161389AbXBGRKG (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:10:06 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 07 Feb 2007 17:10:05 -0000 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19m39k7cM5mu01kbcxF1WgFTGuYo5RPd2XVW2Te4F hLOA== X-X-Sender: gene099@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de In-Reply-To: <45CA06E7.3050704@xs4all.nl> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > Johannes Schindelin escreveu: > > > BTW do you have side branches in that darcs gub repository? If not, I'll > > try to leech it into a git repo with tailor (I do not want to install > > darcs on all my machines, just to play with gub). > > No, but I have a conversion running here. I'll publish it once it's done. Thank you very much! Just out of curiosity: What do you use to convert it? Tailor all branches, then stitch them together? (With tailor, stitching is possible as long as you did not merge branches: the commit objects _will_ be identical, since even the commit timestamps are derived from the source repository.) Ciao, Dscho