From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: git log filtering Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 19:06:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: References: <68948ca0702070841m76817d9el7ce2ec69835c50e@mail.gmail.com> <7v64ad7l12.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vps8l65fh.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070208061654.GA8813@coredump.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Linus Torvalds , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 08 19:06:53 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HFDfJ-0007qX-IC for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 19:06:37 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752381AbXBHSGb (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:06:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752382AbXBHSGb (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:06:31 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:57975 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752380AbXBHSGa (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Feb 2007 13:06:30 -0500 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Feb 2007 18:06:28 -0000 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19IPY970ylIfUDOZbVU6Dae4JwqJxFjy/PTfIph1R JaXg== X-X-Sender: gene099@wbgn013.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de In-Reply-To: <20070208061654.GA8813@coredump.intra.peff.net> X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Hi, On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Jeff King wrote: > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 01:53:18PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > What's PCRE performance like? I'd hate to make "git grep" slower, and it > > would be stupid and confusing to use two different regex libraries.. > > > > Maybe somebody could test - afaik, PCRE has a regex-compatible (from a API > > standpoint, not from a regex standpoint!) wrapper thing, and it might be > > interesting to hear if doing "git grep" is slower or faster.. > > The patch is delightfully simple (though a real patch would probably be > conditional): > > [...] May I register a complaint? This is yet _another_ dependency. Ciao, Dscho