All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pack-objects: re-validate data we copy from elsewhere.
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 15:16:47 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609031510330.27779@g5.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0609031456520.27779@g5.osdl.org>



On Sun, 3 Sep 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> Ok. Is it less painful if it just checks the zlib CRC (and that the SHA1 
> _exists_ for a delta - although I guess we check that indirectly by just 
> accepting the delta in the first place)? That combination should still be 
> a fairly strong check, of course.

Thinking some more about it, doing the stupid "apply full delta chain and 
check the final SHA1" is horribly inefficient, because if you have a repo 
that packs well, you'd expect to have a lot of things with a 10-deep delta 
chain.

And doing it the silly way means that you'll do each object independently, 
ie for a 10-deep chain you'd unpack the base object ten times, and apply 
the first delta 9 times, the second one 8 times etc etc. And each time 
you'd deflate everything, since we don't keep a cache of actual object 
contents.

So I'd expect that with full SHA1 checking, you'd end up doing ~45 
deflates for the ten-object chain, instead of doing just 10.

So it should hopefully be _much_ cheaper to just check the zlib CRC, not 
because the "apply delta" and "calculate sha1" are necessarily all that 
expensive, but because the unoptimized chain-unpacking is doing so much 
unnecessary work.

			Linus

-- 
VGER BF report: U 0.5

  reply	other threads:[~2006-09-03 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <9e4733910608290943g6aa79855q62b98caf4f19510@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <20060829165811.GB21729@spearce.org>
     [not found]   ` <9e4733910608291037k2d9fb791v18abc19bdddf5e89@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <20060829175819.GE21729@spearce.org>
     [not found]       ` <9e4733910608291155g782953bbv5df1b74878f4fcf1@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]         ` <20060829190548.GK21729@spearce.org>
     [not found]           ` <9e4733910608291252q130fc723r945e6ab906ca6969@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]             ` <20060829232007.GC22935@spearce.org>
     [not found]               ` <9e4733910608291807q9b896e4sdbfaa9e49de58c2b@mail.gmail.com>
2006-08-30  1:51                 ` Mozilla .git tree Shawn Pearce
2006-08-30  2:25                   ` Shawn Pearce
2006-08-30  2:58                   ` Jon Smirl
2006-08-30  3:10                     ` Shawn Pearce
2006-08-30  3:27                       ` Jon Smirl
2006-08-30  5:53                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-08-30 11:42                         ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-01  7:42                           ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02  1:19                             ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02  4:01                               ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02  4:39                                 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 11:06                                   ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 14:20                                     ` Jon Smirl
2006-09-02 17:39                                       ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 18:56                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-02 20:53                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 17:44                                     ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02  2:04                             ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 11:02                               ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 17:51                                 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 20:55                                   ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-03  3:54                                     ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-01 17:45                           ` A Large Angry SCM
2006-09-01 18:35                             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-01 19:56                               ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-01 23:14                               ` [PATCH] pack-objects: re-validate data we copy from elsewhere Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02  0:23                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-02  1:39                                   ` VGER BF report? Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-02  5:58                                     ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-09-02  1:52                                   ` [PATCH] pack-objects: re-validate data we copy from elsewhere Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02  3:52                                   ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02  4:52                                     ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02  9:42                                       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 17:43                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-02 10:09                                       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 17:54                                         ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-03 21:00                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-04  4:10                                             ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-04  5:50                                               ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-04  6:44                                                 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-04  7:39                                                   ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-03  0:27                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-03  0:32                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-05  8:12                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 18:43                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-02 20:56                                       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-03 21:48                                       ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-03 22:00                                         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-03 22:16                                           ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2006-09-03 22:34                                           ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-04  4:06                                             ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-04 15:19                                               ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0609031510330.27779@g5.osdl.org \
    --to=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.