From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:56:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <87k61yt1x2.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <455A1137.8030301@shadowen.org> <87hcx1u934.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <20061114194707.GH7201@pasky.or.cz> <87d57pu4qa.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <7v3b8lv9c9.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20061115040852.GL7201@pasky.or.cz> <7vd57ps51c.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 14:57:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org In-reply-to: X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GkMC0-0008SN-T7 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 15:56:50 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030528AbWKOO4b (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:56:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030527AbWKOO4b (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:56:31 -0500 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:18901 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030529AbWKOO4a (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:56:30 -0500 Received: from xanadu.home ([74.56.106.175]) by VL-MO-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0J8S00CHR1I5DNF0@VL-MO-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:56:29 -0500 (EST) To: Jakub Narebski Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Jakub Narebski wrote: > Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Nov 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > >> Yes. The current "merge" started its life as Linus's porcelain > >> (we did not have fetch and pull infrastructure back then) but > >> quickly has become just a helper for pull to produce a merge > >> commit. If anybody thinks its UI is good as a general end-user > >> level command, there is a need for "head examination". > > > > If you mean "git merge" it sure needs to be brought forward. It can't > > be clearer than: > > > > git-merge the_other_branch > > > > or > > > > git-merge git://repo.com/time_machine.git > > > > to instantaneously understand what is going on. > > You mean > > git merge git://repo.com/time_machine.git#branch > > don't you (perhaps with 'master' as default branch)? Something like that. I wantee to enphasize on the "merge" command that should deal with, hey, merges. I don't know if # is a good choice for branch indicator though.