From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.176.0/21 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: Cleaning up git user-interface warts Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:40:03 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <87k61yt1x2.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <200611151858.51833.andyparkins@gmail.com> <87velgs9hx.wl%cworth@cworth.org> <7virhgjt25.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Carl Worth , "Michael K. Edwards" , Linus Torvalds , git@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org In-reply-to: <7virhgjt25.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GkSUM-0006ox-3f for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 22:40:10 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161739AbWKOVkG (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:40:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1161728AbWKOVkG (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:40:06 -0500 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:63426 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1161739AbWKOVkE (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:40:04 -0500 Received: from xanadu.home ([74.56.106.175]) by VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0J8S003D8K6R1C90@VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 15 Nov 2006 16:40:03 -0500 (EST) To: Junio C Hamano Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 15 Nov 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I am wondering if that could be "git merge ..." > instead. I do not care too much about the ... part (i.e. an > Octopus), but I often find myself doing: > > git checkout next > git merge "Merge early part of branch 'foo'" HEAD foo~3 > > when earlier part of "foo" topic are worthy to be in 'next' but > not the later ones. Indeed !