From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Pitre Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics) Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:50:00 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <7vr6u3cmsi.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v3b6i75i5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 11 04:50:26 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H4qxG-0000Uk-1h for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 04:50:18 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965019AbXAKDuE (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:50:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965048AbXAKDuE (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:50:04 -0500 Received: from relais.videotron.ca ([24.201.245.36]:33923 "EHLO relais.videotron.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965019AbXAKDuB (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:50:01 -0500 Received: from xanadu.home ([74.56.106.175]) by VL-MO-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-2.05 (built Apr 28 2005)) with ESMTP id <0JBO007NDQNCOG30@VL-MO-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for git@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2007 22:50:00 -0500 (EST) In-reply-to: <7v3b6i75i5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> X-X-Sender: nico@xanadu.home To: Junio C Hamano Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: > * jc/detached-head (Tue Jan 9 20:39:09 2007 -0800) 9 commits I want to say that this is really great and well done. > * sp/describe (Wed Jan 10 06:39:47 2007 -0500) 1 commit > - Chose better tag names in git-describe after merges. > > Slowing it down by 4x is very unfortunate. I think there is a > better way to walk the ancestry than doing one at a time to > count the commits, but I did not have enough time to look at > this today. However git-describe is certainly not a frequent and speed critical operation, and even if it cannot be sped up then waiting 300 ms more won't really affect one's workflow that badly. Nicolas