From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946041AbXBILfO (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 06:35:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946051AbXBILfO (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 06:35:14 -0500 Received: from scrub.xs4all.nl ([194.109.195.176]:36300 "EHLO scrub.xs4all.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946041AbXBILfM (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Feb 2007 06:35:12 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:35:04 +0100 (CET) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@scrub.home To: Oleg Verych cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: The who needs reviews anyways [PATCH] In-Reply-To: <20070209052245.GC28386@flower.upol.cz> Message-ID: References: <20070209052245.GC28386@flower.upol.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Fri, 9 Feb 2007, Oleg Verych wrote: > > - else if [ -x /bin/bash ]; then echo /bin/bash; \ > > - else echo sh; fi ; fi) > > + else if [ -x /bin/bash ]; then echo /bin/bash; fi; fi) > > +ifeq ($(CONFIG_SHELL),) > > +$(error bash is required to build the kernel) > > +endif > > +SHELL := $(CONFIG_SHELL) > > here is policy to have `bash' introduced, so due to original > issue, where `root' users ended with removed /dev/null, may policy to have > `non root' user to build kernel be added? Thus I doubt gentoo user will like you for that and above is more a de facto requirement that bash is needed for kbuild. The alternative is to introduce a new policy that everything is POSIX clean. > this: > > + rm -f "$$TMP") > > may be removed, and to make TMP=/dev/null? And to forget currently about > my silly symlinks, and this crappy sets of output files? This still wouldn't work, as these tests are also done when running 'make install'. > > -as-instr = $(call checker-shell,\ > > - printf "$(1)" | $(CC) $(AFLAGS) -c -xassembler -o $$OUT -,$(2),$(3)) > > `printf $(1)' is pretty enough. As Andreas suggested 'printf "%b" "$(1)"' would be the other alternative. bye, Roman