* [patch] (2nd try) add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c ...
@ 2007-02-12 0:24 Davide Libenzi
2007-02-13 4:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Davide Libenzi @ 2007-02-12 0:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: David Woodhouse, Linux Kernel Mailing List
Add epoll compat_ code to kernel/compat.c. IA64 and ARM-OABI are currently
using their own version of epoll compat_ code and they could probably wire
to the new common code.
Unfortunately, sys_epoll_pwait needs two compat versions, one for sigset_t
only, and one for sigset_t+epoll_event.
Architectures that do not require epoll_event translation [1] whould wire
compat_sys_epoll_pwait, while the ones that do require it, should wire
compat_sys_epoll_pwait2.
Architectures that do not require epoll_event translation, should *not*
wire neither compat_sys_epoll_ctl nor compat_sys_epoll_wait.
Patch over 2.6.20.
[1] An architecture needs epoll_event translation is alignof(u64) in 32
bits mode is 4, *and* alignof(u64) in 64 bits mode is 8.
Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
- Davide
diff -Nru linux-2.6.20/fs/eventpoll.c linux-2.6.20.mod/fs/eventpoll.c
--- linux-2.6.20/fs/eventpoll.c 2007-02-04 10:44:54.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.20.mod/fs/eventpoll.c 2007-02-11 15:26:07.000000000 -0800
@@ -544,8 +544,7 @@
* file descriptors inside the interest set. It represents
* the kernel part of the user space epoll_ctl(2).
*/
-asmlinkage long
-sys_epoll_ctl(int epfd, int op, int fd, struct epoll_event __user *event)
+asmlinkage long sys_epoll_ctl(int epfd, int op, int fd, struct epoll_event __user *event)
{
int error;
struct file *file, *tfile;
@@ -707,8 +706,8 @@
* part of the user space epoll_pwait(2).
*/
asmlinkage long sys_epoll_pwait(int epfd, struct epoll_event __user *events,
- int maxevents, int timeout, const sigset_t __user *sigmask,
- size_t sigsetsize)
+ int maxevents, int timeout, const sigset_t __user *sigmask,
+ size_t sigsetsize)
{
int error;
sigset_t ksigmask, sigsaved;
diff -Nru linux-2.6.20/include/linux/compat.h linux-2.6.20.mod/include/linux/compat.h
--- linux-2.6.20/include/linux/compat.h 2007-02-09 16:14:20.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.20.mod/include/linux/compat.h 2007-02-11 16:11:37.000000000 -0800
@@ -234,5 +234,35 @@
compat_ulong_t maxnode, const compat_ulong_t __user *old_nodes,
const compat_ulong_t __user *new_nodes);
+/*
+ * epoll (fs/eventpoll.c) compat bits follow ...
+ */
+struct epoll_event;
+
+struct compat_epoll_event {
+ u32 events;
+ u32 data[2];
+};
+
+asmlinkage long compat_sys_epoll_ctl(int epfd, int op, int fd,
+ struct compat_epoll_event __user *event);
+asmlinkage long compat_sys_epoll_wait(int epfd, struct compat_epoll_event __user *events,
+ int maxevents, int timeout);
+/*
+ * Architectures that does not need "struct epoll_event" translation
+ * should wire compat_sys_epoll_pwait. The ones that needs "struct epoll_event"
+ * translation, should wire compat_sys_epoll_pwait2. An architecture needs
+ * "struct epoll_event" translation is alignof(u64) in 32 bits mode is 4, and
+ * alignof(u64) in 64 bits mode is 8.
+ */
+asmlinkage long compat_sys_epoll_pwait(int epfd, struct epoll_event __user *events,
+ int maxevents, int timeout,
+ const compat_sigset_t __user *sigmask,
+ compat_size_t sigsetsize);
+asmlinkage long compat_sys_epoll_pwait2(int epfd, struct compat_epoll_event __user *events,
+ int maxevents, int timeout,
+ const compat_sigset_t __user *sigmask,
+ compat_size_t sigsetsize);
+
#endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
#endif /* _LINUX_COMPAT_H */
diff -Nru linux-2.6.20/kernel/compat.c linux-2.6.20.mod/kernel/compat.c
--- linux-2.6.20/kernel/compat.c 2007-02-04 10:44:54.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.20.mod/kernel/compat.c 2007-02-11 16:11:01.000000000 -0800
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/timex.h>
#include <linux/migrate.h>
#include <linux/posix-timers.h>
+#include <linux/eventpoll.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
@@ -1016,3 +1017,141 @@
return sys_migrate_pages(pid, nr_bits + 1, old, new);
}
#endif
+
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_EPOLL
+
+/*
+ * epoll (fs/eventpoll.c) compat functions follow ...
+ */
+
+asmlinkage long compat_sys_epoll_ctl(int epfd, int op, int fd,
+ struct compat_epoll_event __user *event)
+{
+ long err = 0;
+ struct compat_epoll_event user;
+ struct epoll_event __user *kernel = NULL;
+ union {
+ u64 q;
+ u32 d[2];
+ } mux;
+
+ if (event) {
+ if (copy_from_user(&user, event, sizeof(user)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ kernel = compat_alloc_user_space(sizeof(struct epoll_event));
+ err |= __put_user(user.events, &kernel->events);
+ mux.d[0] = user.data[0];
+ mux.d[1] = user.data[1];
+ err |= __put_user(mux.q, &kernel->data);
+ }
+
+ return err ? err: sys_epoll_ctl(epfd, op, fd, kernel);
+}
+
+
+asmlinkage long compat_sys_epoll_wait(int epfd, struct compat_epoll_event __user *events,
+ int maxevents, int timeout)
+{
+ long i, ret, err = 0;
+ struct epoll_event __user *kbuf;
+ struct epoll_event ev;
+ union {
+ u64 q;
+ u32 d[2];
+ } mux;
+
+ if (maxevents <= 0 || maxevents > (INT_MAX / sizeof(struct epoll_event)))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ kbuf = compat_alloc_user_space(sizeof(struct epoll_event) * maxevents);
+ ret = sys_epoll_wait(epfd, kbuf, maxevents, timeout);
+ for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
+ err |= __get_user(ev.events, &kbuf[i].events);
+ err |= __get_user(ev.data, &kbuf[i].data);
+ err |= put_user(ev.events, &events->events);
+ mux.q = ev.data;
+ err |= put_user(mux.d[0], &events->data[0]);
+ err |= put_user(mux.d[1], &events->data[1]);
+ events++;
+ }
+
+ return err ? -EFAULT: ret;
+}
+
+
+#ifdef TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK
+
+static long __sys_epoll_pwait(int epfd, void __user *events, int maxevents,
+ int timeout, const compat_sigset_t __user *sigmask,
+ compat_size_t sigsetsize,
+ long (asmlinkage *proc)(int, void __user *, int, int))
+{
+ long err;
+ compat_sigset_t ss32;
+ sigset_t ksigmask, sigsaved;
+
+ /*
+ * If the caller wants a certain signal mask to be set during the wait,
+ * we apply it here.
+ */
+ if (sigmask) {
+ if (sigsetsize != sizeof(compat_sigset_t))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (copy_from_user(&ss32, sigmask, sizeof(ss32)))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ sigset_from_compat(&ksigmask, &ss32);
+ sigdelsetmask(&ksigmask, sigmask(SIGKILL) | sigmask(SIGSTOP));
+ sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &ksigmask, &sigsaved);
+ }
+
+ err = (*proc)(epfd, events, maxevents, timeout);
+
+ /*
+ * If we changed the signal mask, we need to restore the original one.
+ * In case we've got a signal while waiting, we do not restore the
+ * signal mask yet, and we allow do_signal() to deliver the signal on the way
+ * back to userspace, before the signal mask is restored.
+ */
+ if (sigmask) {
+ if (err == -EINTR) {
+ memcpy(¤t->saved_sigmask, &sigsaved,
+ sizeof(sigsaved));
+ set_thread_flag(TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK);
+ } else
+ sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, &sigsaved, NULL);
+ }
+
+ return err;
+}
+
+
+/*
+ * Architectures that does not need "struct epoll_event" translation
+ * should wire compat_sys_epoll_pwait. The ones that needs "struct epoll_event"
+ * translation, should wire compat_sys_epoll_pwait2. An architecture needs
+ * "struct epoll_event" translation is alignof(u64) in 32 bits mode is 4, and
+ * alignof(u64) in 64 bits mode is 8.
+ */
+asmlinkage long compat_sys_epoll_pwait(int epfd, struct epoll_event __user *events,
+ int maxevents, int timeout,
+ const compat_sigset_t __user *sigmask,
+ compat_size_t sigsetsize)
+{
+ return __sys_epoll_pwait(epfd, events, maxevents, timeout, sigmask, sigsetsize,
+ (long (asmlinkage *)(int, void __user *, int, int)) sys_epoll_wait);
+}
+
+
+asmlinkage long compat_sys_epoll_pwait2(int epfd, struct compat_epoll_event __user *events,
+ int maxevents, int timeout,
+ const compat_sigset_t __user *sigmask,
+ compat_size_t sigsetsize)
+{
+ return __sys_epoll_pwait(epfd, events, maxevents, timeout, sigmask, sigsetsize,
+ (long (asmlinkage *)(int, void __user *, int, int)) compat_sys_epoll_wait);
+}
+
+#endif /* #ifdef TIF_RESTORE_SIGMASK */
+
+#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_EPOLL */
+
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [patch] (2nd try) add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c ...
2007-02-12 0:24 [patch] (2nd try) add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c Davide Libenzi
@ 2007-02-13 4:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2007-02-13 7:26 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-02-13 14:43 ` James Bottomley
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2007-02-13 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Davide Libenzi
Cc: Andrew Morton, David Woodhouse, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arch
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5048 bytes --]
Hi Davide,
[Linux-arch readers can skip to the last few paragraphs ...]
Just a couple of nits to start:
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 16:24:30 -0800 (PST) Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:
>
> diff -Nru linux-2.6.20/fs/eventpoll.c linux-2.6.20.mod/fs/eventpoll.c
> --- linux-2.6.20/fs/eventpoll.c 2007-02-04 10:44:54.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.20.mod/fs/eventpoll.c 2007-02-11 15:26:07.000000000 -0800
The changes to this file are just white space. Don't include it with
this patch (if at all).
> diff -Nru linux-2.6.20/include/linux/compat.h linux-2.6.20.mod/include/linux/compat.h
> --- linux-2.6.20/include/linux/compat.h 2007-02-09 16:14:20.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.20.mod/include/linux/compat.h 2007-02-11 16:11:37.000000000 -0800
> @@ -234,5 +234,35 @@
> compat_ulong_t maxnode, const compat_ulong_t __user *old_nodes,
> const compat_ulong_t __user *new_nodes);
>
> +/*
> + * epoll (fs/eventpoll.c) compat bits follow ...
> + */
> +struct epoll_event;
> +
> +struct compat_epoll_event {
> + u32 events;
> + u32 data[2];
> +};
> +
> +asmlinkage long compat_sys_epoll_ctl(int epfd, int op, int fd,
> + struct compat_epoll_event __user *event);
> +asmlinkage long compat_sys_epoll_wait(int epfd, struct compat_epoll_event __user *events,
> + int maxevents, int timeout);
> +/*
> + * Architectures that does not need "struct epoll_event" translation
^^^^
should be "do"
> + * should wire compat_sys_epoll_pwait. The ones that needs "struct epoll_event"
^^^^^
should be "need"
Sorry for the grammar lesson.
> + * translation, should wire compat_sys_epoll_pwait2. An architecture needs
> + * "struct epoll_event" translation is alignof(u64) in 32 bits mode is 4, and
^^ ^^^^
should be "if" and we normally say "32 bit mode"
> + * alignof(u64) in 64 bits mode is 8.
"64 bit mode"
> +asmlinkage long compat_sys_epoll_pwait2(int epfd, struct compat_epoll_event __user *events,
Try to stay less than 80 columns wide.
> diff -Nru linux-2.6.20/kernel/compat.c linux-2.6.20.mod/kernel/compat.c
> --- linux-2.6.20/kernel/compat.c 2007-02-04 10:44:54.000000000 -0800
> +++ linux-2.6.20.mod/kernel/compat.c 2007-02-11 16:11:01.000000000 -0800
> +asmlinkage long compat_sys_epoll_ctl(int epfd, int op, int fd,
> + struct compat_epoll_event __user *event)
> +{
> + long err = 0;
> + struct compat_epoll_event user;
> + struct epoll_event __user *kernel = NULL;
> + union {
> + u64 q;
> + u32 d[2];
> + } mux;
> +
> + if (event) {
> + if (copy_from_user(&user, event, sizeof(user)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + kernel = compat_alloc_user_space(sizeof(struct epoll_event));
> + err |= __put_user(user.events, &kernel->events);
> + mux.d[0] = user.data[0];
> + mux.d[1] = user.data[1];
> + err |= __put_user(mux.q, &kernel->data);
A better way here might be to have each 64 bit architecture define
compat_epoll_event in its asm/compat.h and then you can just use:
if (copy_from_user(&user, event, sizeof(user)))
return -EFAULT;
kernel = compat_alloc_user_space(sizeof(struct epoll_event));
err |= __put_user(user.events, &kernel->events);
err |= __put_user(user.data, &kernel->data);
And you shouldn't need the compat routine if
offsetof(struct compat_epoll_event, data) == offsetof(struct epoll_event, data).
> +asmlinkage long compat_sys_epoll_wait(int epfd, struct compat_epoll_event __user *events,
> + int maxevents, int timeout)
> +{
> + long i, ret, err = 0;
> + struct epoll_event __user *kbuf;
> + struct epoll_event ev;
> + union {
> + u64 q;
> + u32 d[2];
> + } mux;
> +
> + if (maxevents <= 0 || maxevents > (INT_MAX / sizeof(struct epoll_event)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> + kbuf = compat_alloc_user_space(sizeof(struct epoll_event) * maxevents);
> + ret = sys_epoll_wait(epfd, kbuf, maxevents, timeout);
> + for (i = 0; i < ret; i++) {
> + err |= __get_user(ev.events, &kbuf[i].events);
> + err |= __get_user(ev.data, &kbuf[i].data);
> + err |= put_user(ev.events, &events->events);
> + mux.q = ev.data;
> + err |= put_user(mux.d[0], &events->data[0]);
> + err |= put_user(mux.d[1], &events->data[1]);
> + events++;
> + }
Similarly here.
OK, I have thought about this some more and I *think* the only
architecture that needs compat_sys_epoll_ctl or compat_sys_epoll_wait is
ia64 where the 64 bit version of struct epoll_event is different from the
32 bit version. On x86_64, the struct is explictly packed (so it is the
same as the 32 bit version) and on all the other 64 bit architectures the
alignment of the u64 is the same as the equivalent 32 bit version.
Since ia64 already has its own version of these two, we only have to
worry about epoll_pwait and then the struct epoll_event is only a problem
for ia64.
Am I right? (I have cc'd linux-arch for guidance.)
(sorry for the long early bit of this mail)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [patch] (2nd try) add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c ...
2007-02-13 4:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
@ 2007-02-13 7:26 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-02-13 10:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2007-02-13 14:43 ` James Bottomley
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Davide Libenzi @ 2007-02-13 7:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Andrew Morton, David Woodhouse, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arch
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> A better way here might be to have each 64 bit architecture define
> compat_epoll_event in its asm/compat.h and then you can just use:
>
> if (copy_from_user(&user, event, sizeof(user)))
> return -EFAULT;
> kernel = compat_alloc_user_space(sizeof(struct epoll_event));
> err |= __put_user(user.events, &kernel->events);
> err |= __put_user(user.data, &kernel->data);
>
> And you shouldn't need the compat routine if
> offsetof(struct compat_epoll_event, data) == offsetof(struct epoll_event, data).
That is *definitely* better, because at that point you can make them also
define a NEED_COMPAT_EPOLL_{CTL,WAIT}, and that code can be excluded
altogether if not needed. I simply wanted to reduce work for arch
maintainers, but I'm all for something like the above.
> OK, I have thought about this some more and I *think* the only
> architecture that needs compat_sys_epoll_ctl or compat_sys_epoll_wait is
> ia64 where the 64 bit version of struct epoll_event is different from the
> 32 bit version. On x86_64, the struct is explictly packed (so it is the
> same as the 32 bit version) and on all the other 64 bit architectures the
> alignment of the u64 is the same as the equivalent 32 bit version.
>
> Since ia64 already has its own version of these two, we only have to
> worry about epoll_pwait and then the struct epoll_event is only a problem
> for ia64.
>
> Am I right? (I have cc'd linux-arch for guidance.)
ARM-OABI also defines them, dunno why. Rmk?
- Davide
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [patch] (2nd try) add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c ...
2007-02-13 7:26 ` Davide Libenzi
@ 2007-02-13 10:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2007-02-13 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Davide Libenzi
Cc: Andrew Morton, David Woodhouse, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arch
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 464 bytes --]
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 23:26:42 -0800 (PST) Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> wrote:
>
> ARM-OABI also defines them, dunno why. Rmk?
I suspect that OABI stands for old ABI and the alignment of 64 bit
quantities changed at some point. I am pretty sure that arm is only
32bit, but I assume that they need backward compatibility for the old
ABI's alignment.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] (2nd try) add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c ...
2007-02-13 4:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2007-02-13 7:26 ` Davide Libenzi
@ 2007-02-13 14:43 ` James Bottomley
2007-02-13 23:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2007-02-13 14:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell
Cc: Davide Libenzi, Andrew Morton, David Woodhouse,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arch
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 15:35 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> OK, I have thought about this some more and I *think* the only
> architecture that needs compat_sys_epoll_ctl or compat_sys_epoll_wait is
> ia64 where the 64 bit version of struct epoll_event is different from the
> 32 bit version. On x86_64, the struct is explictly packed (so it is the
> same as the 32 bit version) and on all the other 64 bit architectures the
> alignment of the u64 is the same as the equivalent 32 bit version.
>
> Since ia64 already has its own version of these two, we only have to
> worry about epoll_pwait and then the struct epoll_event is only a problem
> for ia64.
>
> Am I right? (I have cc'd linux-arch for guidance.)
Not for parisc at the instruction level. In narrow mode (32 bit mode),
a u64 load has to be done by two 32 bit loads which gives it a 4 byte
alignment requirement. In wide mode (64 bit mode) the 64 bit load
instruction explicitly requires 8 byte alignment, so our u64 alignment
requirements are different. However, this is from the machine code
point of view. I can't say that gcc doesn't enforce an artificial 8
byte alignment of u64 in narrow mode, so I'll defer to the gcc experts
on that one.
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch] (2nd try) add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c ...
2007-02-13 14:43 ` James Bottomley
@ 2007-02-13 23:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2007-02-13 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Bottomley
Cc: Davide Libenzi, Andrew Morton, David Woodhouse,
Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arch
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 775 bytes --]
On Tue, 13 Feb 2007 08:43:05 -0600 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com> wrote:
>
> Not for parisc at the instruction level. In narrow mode (32 bit mode),
> a u64 load has to be done by two 32 bit loads which gives it a 4 byte
> alignment requirement. In wide mode (64 bit mode) the 64 bit load
> instruction explicitly requires 8 byte alignment, so our u64 alignment
> requirements are different. However, this is from the machine code
> point of view. I can't say that gcc doesn't enforce an artificial 8
> byte alignment of u64 in narrow mode, so I'll defer to the gcc experts
> on that one.
Of course, gcc enforced alignment is all we really care about.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-13 23:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-12 0:24 [patch] (2nd try) add epoll compat code to kernel/compat.c Davide Libenzi
2007-02-13 4:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2007-02-13 7:26 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-02-13 10:11 ` Stephen Rothwell
2007-02-13 14:43 ` James Bottomley
2007-02-13 23:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.