All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julian Phillips <julian@quantumfyre.co.uk>
To: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PU PATCH] Fix git fetch for very large ref counts
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2007 10:39:41 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0702131031180.6435@reaper.quantumfyre.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vd54e4ufk.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>

On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> "Julian Phillips" <jp3@quantumfyre.co.uk> writes:
>
>> The updated git fetch in pu is vastly improved on repositories with very
>> large numbers of refs.  The time taken for a no-op fetch over ~9000 refs
>> drops from ~48m to ~0.5m.
>>
>> However, before git fetch will actually run on a repository with ~9000
>> refs the calling interface between fetch and fetch--tool needs to be
>> changed.  The existing version passes the entire reflist on the command
>> line, which means that it is subject to the maxiumum environment size
>> passed to a child process by execve.
>>
>> The following patches add a stdin based interface to fetch--tool allowing
>> the ~9000 refs to be passed without exceeding the environment limit.
>
> Thanks.
>
> But the ones in 'pu' were done primarily as demonstration of
> where the bottlenecks are, and not meant for real-world
> consumption.  I think the final shaving of 0.5m down to a few
> seconds needs to move the ls_remote_result string currently kept
> as a shell variable to a list of strings represented in a
> git-fetch largely rewritten in C, and at that point the
> interface from outside fetch--tool to throw 9000 refs at it
> would be an internal function call and the code you fixed along
> with new function you introduced would probably need to be
> discarded.

And there I was thinking 0.5m was fast ... given how long I've been 
reading this list I really should have know better. ;)

I only really made the changes so I could try your improvements to fetch 
out - if they aren't necessary because you're making it even faster then I 
really don't have much cause to complain.

-- 
Julian

  ---
To be a kind of moral Unix, he touched the hem of Nature's shift.
 		-- Shelley

  reply	other threads:[~2007-02-13 10:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-13  1:21 [PU PATCH] Fix git fetch for very large ref counts Julian Phillips
2007-02-13  1:21 ` [PATCH] Allow fetch--tool to read from stdin Julian Phillips
2007-02-13  1:21   ` [PATCH] Use stdin reflist passing in parse-remote Julian Phillips
2007-02-13  1:21     ` [PATCH] Use stdin reflist passing in git-fetch.sh Julian Phillips
2007-02-13  2:31       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-02-13  3:18 ` [PU PATCH] Fix git fetch for very large ref counts Junio C Hamano
2007-02-13 10:39   ` Julian Phillips [this message]
2007-02-13 17:58     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0702131031180.6435@reaper.quantumfyre.co.uk \
    --to=julian@quantumfyre.co.uk \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=junkio@cox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.