From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2007 18:30:06 -0800 (PST) From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] Add PageMlocked() page state bit and lru infrastructure In-Reply-To: <20070215020916.GS10108@waste.org> Message-ID: References: <20070215012449.5343.22942.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20070215012459.5343.72021.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com> <20070215020916.GS10108@waste.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Matt Mackall Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Christoph Hellwig , Arjan van de Ven , Nigel Cunningham , "Martin J. Bligh" , Peter Zijlstra , Nick Piggin , linux-mm@kvack.org, Rik van Riel , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki List-ID: On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Matt Mackall wrote: > I think we should be much more precise in documenting the semantics of > these bits. This particular comment is imprecise enough to be > incorrect. This bit being set indicates that we saw that it was > mlocked at some point in the past, not any guarantee that it's mlocked > now. And the same for the converse. See further down in the patch. The semantics are described when the PageMlockedXXX ops are defined. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org