From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752864AbXDJJfx (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:35:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753233AbXDJJfx (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:35:53 -0400 Received: from styx.suse.cz ([82.119.242.94]:37021 "EHLO mail.suse.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752864AbXDJJfv (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Apr 2007 05:35:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 11:40:03 +0200 (CEST) From: Jiri Kosina To: Li Yu Cc: yanghong@ccoss.com.cn, linux-usb-devel , hongzhiyi@ccoss.com.cn, Marcel Holtmann , LKML Subject: Re: HID bus prototype - 20070408 In-Reply-To: <46189FE3.6050206@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <200703051532096508636@gmail.com> <45FE6971.6090503@gmail.com> <1174897676.5815.6.camel@violet> <4609CAF2.3040303@ccoss.com.cn> <1175516515.5815.347.camel@violet> <1175532439.5815.375.camel@violet> <4611AAC1.8050303@gmail.com> <02f801c7770d$3eafb050$84163e05@kroptech.com> <036401c77711$cee286d0$84163e05@kroptech.com> <46189FE3.6050206@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 8 Apr 2007, Li Yu wrote: > The attachment is the latest HID bus prototype. It have such changes: > 0. Move the hidp directory from net/bluetooth/ to drivers/hid/. Hi Li, we have been discussing this with Marcel previously, and the decission was to let the hidp code where it is right now, due to it being very closely connected to the bluetooth network stack. > 1. HID/Bluetooth support, ONLY FOR HIGHLY EXPERIMENT. I have no > any such device to test yet. I didn't have time yet to review the patch you sent previously, but I don't still quite understand why does the transport layer matter here? The generic HID layer, as it is in kernel now, makes an abstraction in a way that the HID-specific drivers should not care about the underlying transport layer. > I am sorry for it is not in patch form. That's quite unfortunate. I'll try to review it nevertheless, but it'd be much more convenient if you manage to send a patch. Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina