From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sage Weil Subject: Re: Ceph status for Wheezy Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2012 21:39:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: References: <1341122210.10000.46.camel@julia> <1341786172.24592.49.camel@julia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from cobra.newdream.net ([66.33.216.30]:48204 "EHLO cobra.newdream.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750940Ab2GIEjv (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Jul 2012 00:39:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1341786172.24592.49.camel@julia> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)" Cc: Ceph Development On Sun, 8 Jul 2012, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > Hi Sage, > > On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 23:12 -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > > Fingers crossed! > It may go into Wheezy, but I need some information. > > > Barring any last-minute catastrophies, 0.48 should be released Monday. > It was released since then. But there are several files that I don't > know where to install. First are some headers under /usr/include/crush : > crush.h , hash.h , mapper.h and types.h . I don't think these need to be installed anywhere; they're not currently packaged. Why do you mention them? > I'm sure that librados-config and its manpage goes to librados-dev . Oh, right, we missed that; pushed a patch for that to wip-stable to make sure it builds on all distributions. > What about ceph-disk-activate , ceph-disk-prepare exists , boto_tool and > ceph-coverage ? They are python scripts except the latter being a shell > script. ceph-disk-* are already in ceph. The other two shouldn't be packaged. Is there anything missing on this end? Thanks! sage