From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Cc: dan@debian.org, vagabon.xyz@gmail.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org,
ralf@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: RFC: Sentosa boot fix
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:33:02 +0000 (GMT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0701301713350.9231@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070130.234537.126574565.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> Though I do not object to remove "&& !defined(CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64)"
> from __pa_page_offset(), are there any point of CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64=y
> if your load address was CKSEG0?
Checking for code correctness and validation of the toolchain (Linux is
one of the few non-PIC users of (n)64) without having to chase hardware
that would support running from XPHYS without serious pain (the firmware
being the usual offender).
That said, I have not checked the every single use of __pa_page_offset(),
but the sole existence of this condition raises a question about whether
we are sure __pa_page_offset() is going to be only used on virtual
addresses in the same segment the kernel is linked to. Sometimes
references to both CKSEG0 and XPHYS may be used in the same kernel, e.g.
because the the kernel is linked to XPHYS, but the firmware is limited to
accept CKSEG0 addresses only (and we do call back into firmware on some
platforms).
Maciej
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-30 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-28 18:08 RFC: Sentosa boot fix Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-29 9:59 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-01-29 15:46 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-01-29 16:14 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-01-29 16:27 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-01-30 16:41 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-01-30 17:56 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-01-29 18:07 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-01-29 18:32 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-01-29 18:09 ` Thiemo Seufer
2007-01-29 15:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-29 16:06 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-01-29 16:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2007-01-29 18:47 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-01-30 14:45 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-01-30 15:18 ` Ralf Baechle
2007-01-30 17:33 ` Maciej W. Rozycki [this message]
2007-02-01 9:51 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-02-01 13:20 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-02-01 14:31 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-02-01 14:36 ` Atsushi Nemoto
2007-02-01 15:59 ` Franck Bui-Huu
2007-02-08 15:49 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2007-02-08 16:36 ` Franck Bui-Huu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64N.0701301713350.9231@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl \
--to=macro@linux-mips.org \
--cc=anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp \
--cc=dan@debian.org \
--cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
--cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=vagabon.xyz@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.