From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bart Oldeman <Bart.Oldeman@bristol.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: some problems (1.1.5 and 1.1.4)
Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 12:16:36 +0100 (BST)
Sender: linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.95q.1030701121200.27951A-100000@eis.bris.ac.uk>
References: <20030701101941.48416.qmail@web20204.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <linux-msdos-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030701101941.48416.qmail@web20204.mail.yahoo.com>
List-Id: <linux-msdos.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-msdos@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Will Styles wrote:

> --- Justin Zygmont <jzygmont@solarflow.dyndns.org> wrote:
> > i'll try.  however when I managed to try again with 1.1.4, the problem was 
> > there, just not quite as bad.  
> well the patchset number is really critical here...
> 
> > So I don't know if it'll make much 
> > difference if it was like that all along.
> > 
> i'm not concerned with persistent problems.
> i'm more concerned about this: if the situation gets *drastically* worse from
> 1.1.4.9 to 1.1.4.10, i know what the problem is. so i am most interested in
> these 2 revisions.

hmm what would be the problem in 1.1.4.10? I can see
+       - allow DSP commands in high speed mode (fixed problem with
+         Pinball Dreams 2)

@@ -754,7 +753,7 @@
   case 0x0C:           /* dsp write register */
                if (SB_dsp.dma_mode & HIGH_SPEED_DMA) {
                  S_printf("SB: Commands are not permitted in High-Speed DMA mode!\n");
-                 break;
+                 /* break; */
                }
                sb_dsp_write ( value );
                break;

Does this change make all the difference for you? Funny...

Bart