All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	HPPA List <parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org>
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] [2.5] ns87415 irq
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 17:32:12 +0200 (MET DST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.4.30.0307111726350.7550-100000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030711151640.GD20424@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk>

On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Matthew Wilcox wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 04:02:50PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Gwe, 2003-07-11 at 15:07, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > Would this patch make sense for 2.5?  I have to confess not testing it
> > > on any hardware, but it seems to be the Right Thing (and I'm sure Alan
> > > remembers the mess we had in the 2.4 parisc tree for this ...)
> >
> > Yes, it makes sense to do this generally. However can you also pass
> > hwif to the ide_default_irq function because that lets the arch code
> > work out what pci bus the device is nailed to
>
> Erm, that seems like more work than I should be doing.  That would touch
> 36 files, including a lot of mips/ppc ide files.  Or did you want Bart
> to make that change?

Alan, are there any benefits of doing this?

> BTW, Bart, seems like sparc64 does _have_ the ide_default_irq() function,
> it just returns 0.  So I think this patch shouldn't break anything.

Yes, but 0 != 14 && 0 != 15. I am just paranoid. :-)

> --
> "It's not Hollywood.  War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
> victory, it is about death.  I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
> Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-11 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-11 14:07 [parisc-linux] [2.5] ns87415 irq Matthew Wilcox
2003-07-11 14:26 ` [parisc-linux] " Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-07-11 14:43   ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-07-11 15:24   ` Grant Grundler
2003-07-11 15:02 ` [parisc-linux] " Alan Cox
2003-07-11 15:16   ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-07-11 15:32     ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz [this message]
2003-07-11 15:35       ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-07-11 15:47         ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2003-07-11 17:13       ` Alan Cox
     [not found] <3F10355C.2080303@tiscali.be>
2003-07-14 10:41 ` Joel Soete

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.SOL.4.30.0307111726350.7550-100000@mion.elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --to=b.zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
    --cc=willy@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.