From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0128CC4338F for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 11:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D052360E9C for ; Sat, 24 Jul 2021 11:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231938AbhGXKfG convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jul 2021 06:35:06 -0400 Received: from aposti.net ([89.234.176.197]:51348 "EHLO aposti.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229586AbhGXKfG (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Jul 2021 06:35:06 -0400 Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 12:15:26 +0100 From: Paul Cercueil Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] remoteproc: Ingenic: Add support for new Ingenic SoCs. To: =?UTF-8?b?5ZGo55Cw5p2w?= Cc: ohad@wizery.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dongsheng.qiu@ingenic.com, aric.pzqi@ingenic.com, rick.tyliu@ingenic.com, sihui.liu@ingenic.com, jun.jiang@ingenic.com, sernia.zhou@foxmail.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <1627117898-125239-3-git-send-email-zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com> References: <1627117898-125239-1-git-send-email-zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com> <1627117898-125239-3-git-send-email-zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org Hi Zhou, Le sam., juil. 24 2021 at 17:11:38 +0800, 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) a écrit : > Add support for probing the ingenic_rproc driver on the JZ4760 SoC, > the JZ4760B SoC, the JZ4775 SoC, and the JZ4780 SoC from Ingenic. > > Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) > --- > drivers/remoteproc/ingenic_rproc.c | 115 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ingenic_rproc.c > b/drivers/remoteproc/ingenic_rproc.c > index a356738..6a2e864 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ingenic_rproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ingenic_rproc.c > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ > /* > * Ingenic JZ47xx remoteproc driver > * Copyright 2019, Paul Cercueil > + * Copyright 2021, 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) > > */ > > #include > @@ -17,7 +18,7 @@ > > #define REG_AUX_CTRL 0x0 > #define REG_AUX_MSG_ACK 0x10 > -#define REG_AUX_MSG 0x14 > +#define REG_AUX_MSG 0x14 > #define REG_CORE_MSG_ACK 0x18 > #define REG_CORE_MSG 0x1C > > @@ -32,6 +33,20 @@ module_param(auto_boot, bool, 0400); > MODULE_PARM_DESC(auto_boot, > "Auto-boot the remote processor [default=false]"); > > +enum ingenic_vpu_version { > + ID_JZ4760, > + ID_JZ4770, > + ID_JZ4775, > +}; The "version" field of ingenic_so_cinfo is not used anywhere, so you can drop this enum completely. > + > +struct ingenic_soc_info { > + enum ingenic_vpu_version version; > + const struct vpu_mem_map *mem_map; > + > + unsigned int num_clks; > + unsigned int num_mems; > +}; > + > struct vpu_mem_map { > const char *name; > unsigned int da; > @@ -43,26 +58,21 @@ struct vpu_mem_info { > void __iomem *base; > }; > > -static const struct vpu_mem_map vpu_mem_map[] = { > - { "tcsm0", 0x132b0000 }, > - { "tcsm1", 0xf4000000 }, > - { "sram", 0x132f0000 }, > -}; > - > /** > * struct vpu - Ingenic VPU remoteproc private structure > * @irq: interrupt number > * @clks: pointers to the VPU and AUX clocks > * @aux_base: raw pointer to the AUX interface registers > - * @mem_info: array of struct vpu_mem_info, which contain the > mapping info of > + * @mem_info: pointers to the struct vpu_mem_info, which contain the > mapping info of > * each of the external memories > * @dev: private pointer to the device > */ > struct vpu { > int irq; > - struct clk_bulk_data clks[2]; > void __iomem *aux_base; > - struct vpu_mem_info mem_info[ARRAY_SIZE(vpu_mem_map)]; > + const struct ingenic_soc_info *soc_info; > + struct clk_bulk_data *clks; > + struct vpu_mem_info *mem_info; > struct device *dev; > }; > > @@ -72,7 +82,7 @@ static int ingenic_rproc_prepare(struct rproc > *rproc) > int ret; > > /* The clocks must be enabled for the firmware to be loaded in TCSM > */ > - ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(vpu->clks), vpu->clks); > + ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(vpu->soc_info->num_clks, vpu->clks); > if (ret) > dev_err(vpu->dev, "Unable to start clocks: %d\n", ret); > > @@ -83,7 +93,7 @@ static int ingenic_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc > *rproc) > { > struct vpu *vpu = rproc->priv; > > - clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(vpu->clks), vpu->clks); > + clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(vpu->soc_info->num_clks, vpu->clks); > > return 0; > } > @@ -127,7 +137,7 @@ static void *ingenic_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc > *rproc, u64 da, size_t len, boo > void __iomem *va = NULL; > unsigned int i; > > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vpu_mem_map); i++) { > + for (i = 0; i < vpu->soc_info->num_mems; i++) { > const struct vpu_mem_info *info = &vpu->mem_info[i]; > const struct vpu_mem_map *map = info->map; > > @@ -163,8 +173,60 @@ static irqreturn_t vpu_interrupt(int irq, void > *data) > return rproc_vq_interrupt(rproc, vring); > } > > +static const struct vpu_mem_map jz4760_vpu_mem_map[] = { > + { "tcsm0", 0x132b0000 }, > + { "tcsm1", 0xf4000000 }, > + { "sram", 0x132d0000 }, > +}; > + > +static const struct vpu_mem_map jz4770_vpu_mem_map[] = { > + { "tcsm0", 0x132b0000 }, > + { "tcsm1", 0xf4000000 }, > + { "sram", 0x132f0000 }, > +}; > + > +static const struct vpu_mem_map jz4775_vpu_mem_map[] = { > + { "tcsm", 0xf4000000 }, > + { "sram", 0x132f0000 }, > +}; > + > +static const struct ingenic_soc_info jz4760_soc_info = { > + .version = ID_JZ4760, > + .mem_map = jz4760_vpu_mem_map, > + > + .num_clks = 2, > + .num_mems = 3, .num_mems = ARRAY_SIZE(jz4760_vpu_mem_map), And the same for the other ingenic_soc_info below. > +}; > + > +static const struct ingenic_soc_info jz4770_soc_info = { > + .version = ID_JZ4770, > + .mem_map = jz4770_vpu_mem_map, > + > + .num_clks = 2, > + .num_mems = 3, > +}; > + > +static const struct ingenic_soc_info jz4775_soc_info = { > + .version = ID_JZ4775, > + .mem_map = jz4775_vpu_mem_map, > + > + .num_clks = 1, > + .num_mems = 2, > +}; > + > +static const struct of_device_id ingenic_rproc_of_matches[] = { > + { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760-vpu-rproc", .data = > &jz4760_soc_info }, > + { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4760b-vpu-rproc", .data = > &jz4760_soc_info }, > + { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4770-vpu-rproc", .data = > &jz4770_soc_info }, > + { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4775-vpu-rproc", .data = > &jz4775_soc_info }, > + { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4780-vpu-rproc", .data = > &jz4775_soc_info }, > + {} > +}; > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ingenic_rproc_of_matches); > + > static int ingenic_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > + const struct of_device_id *id = > of_match_node(ingenic_rproc_of_matches, pdev->dev.of_node); > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; > struct resource *mem; > struct rproc *rproc; > @@ -181,6 +243,7 @@ static int ingenic_rproc_probe(struct > platform_device *pdev) > > vpu = rproc->priv; > vpu->dev = &pdev->dev; > + vpu->soc_info = id->data; Use of_device_get_match_data(dev). Then you can get rid of the "id" variable, and you won't have to move the "ingenic_rproc_of_matches" array. > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, vpu); > > mem = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "aux"); > @@ -190,9 +253,13 @@ static int ingenic_rproc_probe(struct > platform_device *pdev) > return PTR_ERR(vpu->aux_base); > } > > - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vpu_mem_map); i++) { > + vpu->mem_info = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vpu_mem_info) * > vpu->soc_info->num_mems, GFP_KERNEL); You are leaking memory here. Also, why not just fix the current mem_info array size to 3? That sounds way simpler. > + if (!vpu->mem_info) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + for (i = 0; i < vpu->soc_info->num_mems; i++) { > mem = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, > - vpu_mem_map[i].name); > + vpu->soc_info->mem_map[i].name); > > vpu->mem_info[i].base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, mem); > if (IS_ERR(vpu->mem_info[i].base)) { > @@ -202,13 +269,19 @@ static int ingenic_rproc_probe(struct > platform_device *pdev) > } > > vpu->mem_info[i].len = resource_size(mem); > - vpu->mem_info[i].map = &vpu_mem_map[i]; > + vpu->mem_info[i].map = &vpu->soc_info->mem_map[i]; > } > > + vpu->clks = kzalloc(sizeof(struct clk_bulk_data) * > vpu->soc_info->num_clks, GFP_KERNEL); Same here, the "clks" array is already size 2, so it won't be a problem if you have only one clock. No need to alloc "clks" dynamically. > + if (!vpu->clks) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > vpu->clks[0].id = "vpu"; > - vpu->clks[1].id = "aux"; > > - ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(vpu->clks), vpu->clks); > + if (vpu->soc_info->version == ID_JZ4770) > + vpu->clks[1].id = "aux"; > + > + ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, vpu->soc_info->num_clks, vpu->clks); > if (ret) { > dev_err(dev, "Failed to get clocks\n"); > return ret; > @@ -235,12 +308,6 @@ static int ingenic_rproc_probe(struct > platform_device *pdev) > return 0; > } > > -static const struct of_device_id ingenic_rproc_of_matches[] = { > - { .compatible = "ingenic,jz4770-vpu-rproc", }, > - {} > -}; > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ingenic_rproc_of_matches); As I wrote above - you don't need to move this. Cheers, -Paul > - > static struct platform_driver ingenic_rproc_driver = { > .probe = ingenic_rproc_probe, > .driver = { > -- > 2.7.4 >