> -----Original Message----- > From: Wood Scott-B07421 > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2015 7:50 AM > To: Sudeep Holla > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Thomas Gleixner; > Rafael J. Wysocki; Benjamin Herrenschmidt; Paul Mackerras; Michael Ellerman; Jia > Hongtao-B38951; Marc Zyngier; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Wang Dongsheng- > B40534 > Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/17] powerpc: mpic: use IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE instead of > redundant mpic_irq_set_wake > > On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 16:47 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > mpic_irq_set_wake return -ENXIO for non FSL MPIC and sets IRQF_NO_SUSPEND > > flag for FSL ones. enable_irq_wake already returns -ENXIO if irq_set_wak > > is not implemented. Also there's no need to set the IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag > > as it doesn't guarantee wakeup for that interrupt. > > Non-freescale return -ENXIO, is there any issue? If non-freescale platform does not support it, but IPs still use enable/disable_irq_wake, we should return a error number. IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE just skip this feature, this is not our expected. If non-freescale platform need this flag to skip this feature, it should be add in self platform. @Scott: If set this flag we cannot keep a irq as a wakeup source when system going to SUSPEND or MEM. irq_set_wake() means we can set this irq as a wake source. IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE is ignore irq_set_wake() feature. Regards, -Dongsheng {.n++%ݶw{.n+{G{ayʇڙ,jfhz_(階ݢj"mG?&~iOzv^m ?I