All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>
To: "hch@infradead.org" <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	"linux-scsi @ vger . kernel . org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"linux-fsdevel @ vger . kernel . org"
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/10] scsi: sd_zbc: emulate ZONE_APPEND commands
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:09:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN4PR0401MB3598DD3A892162A3FADB06CD9BDA0@SN4PR0401MB3598.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200410063855.GC4791@infradead.org

On 10/04/2020 08:39, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Looking more the situation seems even worse.  If scsi_mq_prep_fn
> isn't successfull we never seem to free the sgtables, even for fatal
> errors.  So I think we need a real bug fix here in front of the series

If I'm not missing something all that needs to be done to fix it is:

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 4724002627cd..5e6165246f77 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -1191,6 +1191,7 @@ static blk_status_t scsi_setup_cmnd(struct 
scsi_device *sdev,
                 struct request *req)
  {
         struct scsi_cmnd *cmd = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
+       blk_status_t ret;

         if (!blk_rq_bytes(req))
                 cmd->sc_data_direction = DMA_NONE;
@@ -1200,9 +1201,14 @@ static blk_status_t scsi_setup_cmnd(struct 
scsi_device *sdev,
                 cmd->sc_data_direction = DMA_FROM_DEVICE;

         if (blk_rq_is_scsi(req))
-               return scsi_setup_scsi_cmnd(sdev, req);
+               ret = scsi_setup_scsi_cmnd(sdev, req);
         else
-               return scsi_setup_fs_cmnd(sdev, req);
+               ret = scsi_setup_fs_cmnd(sdev, req);
+
+       if (ret != BLK_STS_OK)
+               scsi_free_sgtables(cmd);
+
+       return ret;
  }

  static blk_status_t


Theoretically it's enough to catch errors from scsi_setup_fs_cmnd() as 
scsi_setup_scsi_cmnd() either fails scsi_init_io() which means no 
sgtables are allocated or returns BLK_STS_OK.

But for the sake of symmetry and defensive programming I think we can 
also check the return of scsi_setup_scsi_cmnd(). I've checked 
scsi_free_sgtables() and __sg_free_table() and they're double-free safe.

Thoughts?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-14 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-09 16:53 [PATCH v5 00/10] Introduce Zone Append for writing to zoned block devices Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-09 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 01/10] block: provide fallbacks for blk_queue_zone_is_seq and blk_queue_zone_no Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-09 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 02/10] block: Introduce REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-10  7:10   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14  9:43     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-14 11:28       ` hch
2020-04-09 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 03/10] block: introduce blk_req_zone_write_trylock Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-09 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 04/10] block: Modify revalidate zones Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-10  0:27   ` Damien Le Moal
2020-04-10  6:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-10  6:55     ` Damien Le Moal
2020-04-09 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 05/10] scsi: sd_zbc: factor out sanity checks for zoned commands Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-09 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 06/10] scsi: export scsi_mq_free_sgtables Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-10  5:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-10  7:46     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-10 14:22   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-04-09 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 07/10] scsi: sd_zbc: emulate ZONE_APPEND commands Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-10  0:30   ` Damien Le Moal
2020-04-10  6:18   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-10  6:38     ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-10  8:01       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-14 11:09       ` Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2020-04-14 11:30         ` hch
2020-04-10  7:54     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-10  7:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 10:18     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-09 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 08/10] null_blk: Support REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-09 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 09/10] block: export bio_release_pages and bio_iov_iter_get_pages Johannes Thumshirn
2020-04-09 16:53 ` [PATCH v5 10/10] zonefs: use REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND for sync DIO Johannes Thumshirn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN4PR0401MB3598DD3A892162A3FADB06CD9BDA0@SN4PR0401MB3598.namprd04.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
    --cc=Damien.LeMoal@wdc.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.