Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] app: test: measure libipsec performance

["Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>]

> 
> 05/03/2020 12:45, Ananyev, Konstantin:
> > I think the header need to be "app/test", or "test/ipsec".
> 
> It should be "test/ipsec" as it is an IPsec test command
> in the test application.
> 
> > Apart from that:
> > Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> 
> I wonder why we have a different maintainer for each IPsec test.
> It looks a bit confusing.
> 
> IPsec - EXPERIMENTAL
> M: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> T: git://dpdk.org/next/dpdk-next-crypto
> F: lib/librte_ipsec/
> M: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
> F: app/test/test_ipsec.c
> F: doc/guides/prog_guide/ipsec_lib.rst
> M: Savinay Dharmappa <savinay.dharmappa@intel.com>
> F: app/test/test_ipsec_perf.c
> M: Vladimir Medvedkin <vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com>
> F: app/test/test_ipsec_sad.c
> F: app/test-sad/

I suppose mainly by historical reasons -
each of these tests have different authors.
Obviously each author claimed maintanership of his own code.
Do you consider that as a problem?

> 
> In general, only one person takes the responsibility to be
> the main contact of any related question in the area.
> 
> So the file pattern could be:
> F: app/test/test_ipsec*
>