All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ghannam, Yazen" <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"linux-edac@vger.kernel.org" <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/MCE: Save MCA control bits that get set in hardware
Date: Thu, 16 May 2019 17:09:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR12MB26392B440ED735C26AA2C678F80A0@SN6PR12MB2639.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190516165648.GB21857@zn.tnic>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-edac-owner@vger.kernel.org <linux-edac-owner@vger.kernel.org> On Behalf Of Borislav Petkov
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 11:57 AM
> To: Ghannam, Yazen <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>
> Cc: Luck, Tony <tony.luck@intel.com>; linux-edac@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; x86@kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/MCE: Save MCA control bits that get set in hardware
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 04:14:14PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> > I can put a vendor check on the read. Is that sufficient?
> 
> Or we can drop this patch. Remind me again pls why do we need it?
> 

So that the sysfs files show the control values that are set in the hardware. It seemed like this would be more helpful than showing all 0xF's.

But I'm okay with dropping this patch. Patch 6 in this set depends on this, so it'll need to be dropped also.

Should I send out another version of this set?

Thanks,
Yazen

  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-16 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-30 20:32 [PATCH v3 0/6] Handle MCA banks in a per_cpu way Ghannam, Yazen
2019-04-30 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] x86/MCE: Make struct mce_banks[] static Ghannam, Yazen
2019-04-30 20:32   ` [v3,1/6] " Yazen Ghannam
2019-04-30 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] x86/MCE: Handle MCA controls in a per_cpu way Ghannam, Yazen
2019-04-30 20:32   ` [v3,2/6] " Yazen Ghannam
2019-04-30 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] x86/MCE/AMD: Don't cache block addresses on SMCA systems Ghannam, Yazen
2019-04-30 20:32   ` [v3,3/6] " Yazen Ghannam
2019-04-30 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] x86/MCE: Save MCA control bits that get set in hardware Ghannam, Yazen
2019-04-30 20:32   ` [v3,5/6] " Yazen Ghannam
2019-05-16 15:52   ` [PATCH v3 5/6] " Luck, Tony
2019-05-16 16:14     ` Ghannam, Yazen
2019-05-16 16:56       ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-16 17:09         ` Ghannam, Yazen [this message]
2019-05-16 17:21           ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-16 20:20             ` Ghannam, Yazen
2019-05-16 20:34               ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-16 20:59                 ` Luck, Tony
2019-05-17 10:10                   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-17 15:46                     ` Ghannam, Yazen
2019-05-17 16:37                       ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-17 17:26                         ` Luck, Tony
2019-05-17 17:48                           ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-17 18:06                             ` Luck, Tony
2019-05-17 19:34                               ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-17 19:44                                 ` Luck, Tony
2019-05-17 19:50                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-17 19:49                                 ` Ghannam, Yazen
2019-05-17 20:02                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-23 20:00                                     ` Ghannam, Yazen
2019-05-27 23:28                                       ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-07 14:49                                         ` Ghannam, Yazen
2019-06-07 16:37                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-07 16:44                                             ` Ghannam, Yazen
2019-06-07 16:59                                               ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-07 17:08                                                 ` Ghannam, Yazen
2019-06-07 17:20                                                   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-06-11  5:13                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2019-04-30 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] x86/MCE: Make number of MCA banks per_cpu Ghannam, Yazen
2019-04-30 20:32   ` [v3,4/6] " Yazen Ghannam
2019-05-18 11:25   ` [PATCH v3 4/6] " Borislav Petkov
2019-05-21 17:52     ` Ghannam, Yazen
2019-05-21 20:29       ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-21 20:42         ` Luck, Tony
2019-05-21 23:09           ` Borislav Petkov
2019-05-22 14:01             ` Ghannam, Yazen
2019-04-30 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] x86/MCE: Treat MCE bank as initialized if control bits set in hardware Ghannam, Yazen
2019-04-30 20:32   ` [v3,6/6] " Yazen Ghannam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN6PR12MB26392B440ED735C26AA2C678F80A0@SN6PR12MB2639.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=yazen.ghannam@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.