All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "matsuda-daisuke@fujitsu.com" <matsuda-daisuke@fujitsu.com>
To: 'Bart Van Assche' <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	Yanjun Zhu <yanjun.zhu@linux.dev>,
	"linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
	"leonro@nvidia.com" <leonro@nvidia.com>,
	"jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	"zyjzyj2000@gmail.com" <zyjzyj2000@gmail.com>
Cc: "nvdimm@lists.linux.dev" <nvdimm@lists.linux.dev>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"rpearsonhpe@gmail.com" <rpearsonhpe@gmail.com>,
	"yangx.jy@fujitsu.com" <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>,
	"lizhijian@fujitsu.com" <lizhijian@fujitsu.com>,
	"y-goto@fujitsu.com" <y-goto@fujitsu.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 2/7] RDMA/rxe: Convert the triple tasklets to workqueues
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2022 07:58:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <TYCPR01MB8455D739FC9FB034E3485C87E5449@TYCPR01MB8455.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fd1d7c49-a090-e8c7-415b-dfcda94ace9d@acm.org>

On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 12:09 AM Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 9/11/22 00:10, Yanjun Zhu wrote:
> > I also implemented a workqueue for rxe. IMO, can we add a variable to
> > decide to use tasklet or workqueue?
> >
> > If user prefer using tasklet, he can set the variable to use
> > tasklet. And the default is tasklet. Set the variable to another
> > value to use workqueue.

That's an interesting idea, but I am not sure how users specify it.
IIRC, tasklets are generated when rdma link is added, typically by 
executing ' rdma link add' command. I don't think we can add
an device specific option to the utility(iproute2/rdma).

> 
> I'm in favor of removing all uses of the tasklet mechanism because of
> the disadvantages of that mechanism. See also:
> * "Eliminating tasklets" (https://lwn.net/Articles/239633/).
> * "Modernizing the tasklet API" (https://lwn.net/Articles/830964/).
> * Sebastian Andrzej Siewior's opinion about tasklets
> (https://lore.kernel.org/all/YvovfXMJQAUBsvBZ@linutronix.de/).

I am also in favor of using workqueues alone not only because of the
disadvantages above but also to avoid complexity. I would like to know
if there is anybody who will bothered by the change especially in terms
of performance.

Thanks,
Daisuke

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-12  7:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-07  2:42 [RFC PATCH 0/7] RDMA/rxe: On-Demand Paging on SoftRoCE Daisuke Matsuda
2022-09-07  2:42 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] IB/mlx5: Change ib_umem_odp_map_dma_single_page() to retain umem_mutex Daisuke Matsuda
2022-09-07  2:43 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] RDMA/rxe: Convert the triple tasklets to workqueues Daisuke Matsuda
2022-09-09 19:39   ` Bob Pearson
2022-09-12  8:27     ` matsuda-daisuke
2022-09-11  7:10   ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-09-11 15:08     ` Bart Van Assche
2022-09-12  7:58       ` matsuda-daisuke [this message]
2022-09-12  8:29         ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-09-12 19:52         ` Bob Pearson
2022-09-28  6:40           ` matsuda-daisuke
2022-09-12  8:25       ` Yanjun Zhu
2022-09-07  2:43 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] RDMA/rxe: Cleanup code for responder Atomic operations Daisuke Matsuda
2022-09-07  2:43 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] RDMA/rxe: Add page invalidation support Daisuke Matsuda
2022-09-07  2:43 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] RDMA/rxe: Allow registering MRs for On-Demand Paging Daisuke Matsuda
2022-09-08 16:57   ` Haris Iqbal
2022-09-09  0:55     ` matsuda-daisuke
2022-09-07  2:43 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] RDMA/rxe: Add support for Send/Recv/Write/Read operations with ODP Daisuke Matsuda
2022-09-08  8:29   ` Leon Romanovsky
2022-09-09  2:45     ` matsuda-daisuke
2022-09-07  2:43 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] RDMA/rxe: Add support for the traditional Atomic " Daisuke Matsuda
2022-09-08  8:40 ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] RDMA/rxe: On-Demand Paging on SoftRoCE Zhu Yanjun
2022-09-08 10:25   ` matsuda-daisuke
2022-09-09  3:07 ` Li Zhijian
2022-09-12  9:21   ` matsuda-daisuke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=TYCPR01MB8455D739FC9FB034E3485C87E5449@TYCPR01MB8455.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=matsuda-daisuke@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=leonro@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizhijian@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=rpearsonhpe@gmail.com \
    --cc=y-goto@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=yangx.jy@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=yanjun.zhu@linux.dev \
    --cc=zyjzyj2000@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.