From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Kuusisaari, Juhamatti (Coriant - FI/Espoo)"
 <juhamatti.kuusisaari@coriant.com>
Subject: strscpy() support to DPDK?
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 05:33:26 +0000
Message-ID: <VI1PR0402MB2925B3472641560C112F05CF9D040@VI1PR0402MB2925.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com
 (mail-db5eur01on0048.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.2.48])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2C14C90
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 07:33:28 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>


Hello,

There has been some discussion earlier about the downsides of strlcpy().=20

How about adding strscpy() support to DPDK as a better option? It seems tha=
t it really resolves the API issues of strlcpy().

https://lwn.net/Articles/659214/

BR,
--
 Juhamatti