From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Horia Geanta Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 14:33:22 +0000 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v5 8/8] armv8: ls1046a: setup SEC ICIDs and fix up device tree References: <20180727095742.17831-1-laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com> <20180727095742.17831-9-laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com> <258dda7c-09f1-e153-f97b-b8b8a56f3c56@nxp.com> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 7/30/2018 4:58 PM, Laurentiu Tudor wrote: >> The only way to implement a *mechanism* is to provide different ICIDs for all >> the blocks. >> Any other solution would be imposing a *policy*, thus restricting user's >> possibilities. Admittedly there are use cases less "popular" than others, but if >> possible it would be best not to decide for the user and provide full flexibility. >> >> Is there a resource (ICID values) shortage? >> > No. I can change the patch to have distinct ICIDs and resubmit. Please > let me know if you agree on this. > Yes, this is my suggestion. IIUC it's also similar to the way LIODNs are allocated on PPC. True, LS102x is the exception - it assigns ICID 0x10 to all SEC blocks. Regards, Horia