From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Bloch Subject: RE: [PATCH rdma-next V2 5/5] IB/core: Integrate IB address resolution module into core Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 08:29:35 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1462563928-29164-1-git-send-email-leon@kernel.org> <1462563928-29164-6-git-send-email-leon@kernel.org> <20160516163048.GB4662@leon.nu> <298657b0-6e57-745b-5eb3-001984bffbc3@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: In-Reply-To: <298657b0-6e57-745b-5eb3-001984bffbc3-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Doug Ledford , "leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Doug Ledford [mailto:dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org] > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 8:43 PM > To: leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org > Cc: Mark Bloch ; linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next V2 5/5] IB/core: Integrate IB address > resolution module into core > Can you build netlink in and then init the ib_addr module after the > netlink init is complete? Wouldn't that resolve the dependency ordering > issue without changing the module names? Sorry, but I don't understand what do you mean by this. If you would like to keep the current module structure (ib_core.ko and ib_addr.ko) The only way to use ibnl from within addr.c is to move the ibnl initialization to addr.c and build netlink.c as part of ib_addr.ko, but it seems kind of strange if ib_addr is responsible to initialize ibnl. > > -- > Doug Ledford > GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD > Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html