From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2D7C433FE for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 11:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E44922BE8 for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 11:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2437248AbgLLL0o (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Dec 2020 06:26:44 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55840 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2403956AbgLLL0o (ORCPT ); Sat, 12 Dec 2020 06:26:44 -0500 Received: from ganesha.gnumonks.org (ganesha.gnumonks.org [IPv6:2001:780:45:1d:225:90ff:fe52:c662]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4813CC0613CF for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 03:26:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from uucp by ganesha.gnumonks.org with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ko32I-0007pi-Sq; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 12:26:02 +0100 Received: from laforge by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1ko32A-003sWh-89; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 12:25:54 +0100 Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 12:25:54 +0100 From: Harald Welte To: Jonas Bonn Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, pablo@netfilter.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 11/12] gtp: netlink update for ipv6 Message-ID: References: <20201211122612.869225-1-jonas@norrbonn.se> <20201211122612.869225-12-jonas@norrbonn.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20201211122612.869225-12-jonas@norrbonn.se> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 01:26:11PM +0100, Jonas Bonn wrote: > This patch adds the netlink changes required to support IPv6. See my related comment to the other IPv6 patch in this series. It is not legal to assume that v4/v6 are an either-or decision, but it can be either v4-only, v6-only or v4 and v6 in the same PDP context. For the "peer" (outer) address, I think it is correct to assume only either v4 or v6. But for the inner "ms" address, it is not. Regards, Harald -- - Harald Welte http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ ============================================================================ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)