All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: refactor some crtc code out of intel display.
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 13:44:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <X9nzGCAqpRWDCMh5@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87czza5apy.fsf@intel.com>

On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 12:03:37PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020, Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> wrote:
> > From: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
> >
> > There may be more crtc code that can be pulled out, but this
> > is a good start.
> >
> > RFC: maybe call the new file something different
> 
> I checked this is just code movement. I did clean up intel_crtc.h
> locally a bit though. (I'll probably re-send the series with a few fixes
> to pass CI.)
> 
> I'm not averse to renaming the file later if needed, I'm more concerned
> about choosing a meaningful bunch of functions to take out and put in
> the new file.
> 
> Ville, I saw you had some comments about this - is this making sensible
> progress or making further refactoring harder?

Just means we have to move 90% of the proposed intel_crtc.c
into i9xx_plane.c again. So the plane bits here are just
pointless churn IMO.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Intel Finland Oy
Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki 
Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4 
Domiciled in Helsinki 

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution
by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-16 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-11  7:29 [Intel-gfx] [RFC v3] refactor intel display a bit more Dave Airlie
2020-12-11  7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915/display: move needs_modeset to an inline in header Dave Airlie
2020-12-11  7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/display: move to_intel_frontbuffer to header Dave Airlie
2020-12-11  7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/display: fix misused comma Dave Airlie
2020-12-11  7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915: refactor cursor code out of i915_display.c Dave Airlie
2020-12-16 10:05   ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-11  7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915: refactor some crtc code out of intel display Dave Airlie
2020-12-16 10:03   ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-16 11:44     ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2020-12-16 12:18       ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-11  7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915: refactor pll code out into intel_dpll.c Dave Airlie
2020-12-16 10:31   ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-11  7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915: split fdi code out from intel_display.c Dave Airlie
2020-12-16 10:38   ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-11  7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915: migrate hsw fdi code to new file Dave Airlie
2020-12-16 11:07   ` Jani Nikula
2020-12-11  7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: migrate skl planes code " Dave Airlie
2020-12-11 16:53   ` kernel test robot
2020-12-11 16:53     ` kernel test robot
2020-12-11 22:00   ` kernel test robot
2020-12-11 22:00     ` kernel test robot
2020-12-11 22:19   ` kernel test robot
2020-12-11 22:19     ` kernel test robot
2020-12-11 22:19   ` [Intel-gfx] [RFC PATCH] drm/i915: skl_plane_ctl_crtc() can be static kernel test robot
2020-12-11 22:19     ` kernel test robot
2020-12-11  7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915: move pipe update code into crtc Dave Airlie
2020-12-11  7:29 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915: split fb scalable checks into g4x and skl versions Dave Airlie
2020-12-11  7:58 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for series starting with [01/11] drm/i915/display: move needs_modeset to an inline in header Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=X9nzGCAqpRWDCMh5@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.