From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263480AbUDMNqi (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:46:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263493AbUDMNqi (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:46:38 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:19126 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263480AbUDMNqd (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:46:33 -0400 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 09:46:11 -0400 (EDT) From: James Morris X-X-Sender: jmorris@thoron.boston.redhat.com To: Denis Vlasenko cc: "David S. Miller" , , =?iso-2022-jp?Q?YOSHIFUJI_Hideaki_=2F_=1B$B5HF#1QL=40=1B=28B?= , Subject: Re: your mail In-Reply-To: <200404121623.42558.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > According to my measurements, > > ip_vs_control_add() (from include/net/ip_vs.h) is called twice > and > sock_queue_rcv_skb() (from include/net/sock.h) is called 19 times > from various kernel .c files. > > Both these includes generate more than 500 bytes of code on x86. > > These patches uninline them. Please apply. What kind of performance impact (if any) does this patch have? - James -- James Morris