From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>,
Jane Malalane <jane.malalane@citrix.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
"open list:CRYPTO API" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] perf/x86/intel/lbr: use setup_clear_cpu_cap instead of clear_cpu_cap
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:13:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1EtUiyXkPlCe8/Z@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3cc09554f20231aecdf0cd762a282c42aee9273c.camel@redhat.com>
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 01:21:30PM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> I agree with you, however this patch series is just
> refactoring/hardening of the kernel - if the kernel can avoid crashing
> - why not.
Because we're already drowning in patches which are trying to fix real
problems. If we open the floodgates on alleged hardening just because
some other part of the stack is misbehaving, there'll be no end of it.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-20 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-18 14:11 [PATCH v2 0/5] x86: cpuid: improve support for broken CPUID configurations Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-18 14:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] perf/x86/intel/lbr: use setup_clear_cpu_cap instead of clear_cpu_cap Maxim Levitsky
2022-09-19 14:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-09-20 8:20 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-09-26 13:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-09-28 10:49 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-20 8:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-10-20 9:05 ` Herbert Xu
2022-10-20 10:21 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-20 11:13 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2022-10-22 21:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2022-11-02 13:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-11-02 14:27 ` Elliott, Robert (Servers)
2022-11-02 16:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2022-11-02 18:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2022-11-02 19:14 ` Elliott, Robert (Servers)
2022-11-03 13:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-11-03 13:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-10-20 15:17 ` [tip: x86/urgent] perf/x86/intel/lbr: Use setup_clear_cpu_cap() instead of clear_cpu_cap() tip-bot2 for Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-18 14:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/cpuid: refactor setup_clear_cpu_cap()/clear_cpu_cap() Maxim Levitsky
2022-10-21 16:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-07 19:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-07 21:57 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-07-18 14:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] x86/cpuid: move filter_cpuid_features to cpuid-deps.c Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-18 14:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] x86/cpuid: remove 'warn' parameter from filter_cpuid_features Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-18 14:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] x86/cpuid: check for dependencies violations in CPUID and attempt to fix them Maxim Levitsky
2022-07-28 7:30 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] x86: cpuid: improve support for broken CPUID configurations Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-01 16:05 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-08-01 16:31 ` Dave Hansen
2022-08-01 16:41 ` Maxim Levitsky
2022-09-19 13:43 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y1EtUiyXkPlCe8/Z@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jane.malalane@citrix.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.