All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/uaccess: instrument copy_from_user_nmi()
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 10:05:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y1o72704bVK0FgCr@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG_fn=XDeghFBGXT37Mc-ky-8NaPaMmCLdo3Par=xh92Fk_CAQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 11:38:53AM -0700, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> A bigger issue from the NMI perspective is probably
> having __msan_poison_alloca() inserted in every non-noinstr kernel
> function, because that hook may acquire the stackdepot lock.

*urgghhh* that's broken, that must not be. There is a *TON* of NMI
functions that are non-noinstr.

What's worse, it seems to do a memory allocation as well, and that's out
the window with PREEMPT_RT where you can't do even GFP_ATOMIC from
regular IRQ context.

That function is wholly unacceptable to be added to every kernel
function.


  reply	other threads:[~2022-10-27  8:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-10-25 22:17 [PATCH] x86/uaccess: instrument copy_from_user_nmi() Alexander Potapenko
2022-10-26  9:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-26 18:38   ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-10-27  8:05     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2022-10-27 18:26       ` Alexander Potapenko
2022-10-27 18:58         ` Kees Cook
2022-10-27 19:26           ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-10-27 23:24           ` Alexander Potapenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y1o72704bVK0FgCr@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.