From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C51C433FE for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 16:31:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229500AbiKXQb6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:31:58 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33310 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229497AbiKXQb4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:31:56 -0500 Received: from cloud.peff.net (cloud.peff.net [104.130.231.41]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0139016FB2F for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 08:31:55 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 27233 invoked by uid 109); 24 Nov 2022 16:31:55 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO peff.net) (10.0.1.2) by cloud.peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 16:31:55 +0000 Authentication-Results: cloud.peff.net; auth=none Received: (qmail 28687 invoked by uid 111); 24 Nov 2022 16:31:55 -0000 Received: from coredump.intra.peff.net (HELO sigill.intra.peff.net) (10.0.0.2) by peff.net (qpsmtpd/0.94) with (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:31:55 -0500 Authentication-Results: peff.net; auth=none Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 11:31:54 -0500 From: Jeff King To: Yoichi Nakayama Cc: Yoichi Nakayama via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] git-jump: invoke emacs/emacsclient Message-ID: References: <2f0bffb484beccf58f2440ed5e2c04a1ba26e6c3.1669126703.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 09:58:04PM +0900, Yoichi Nakayama wrote: > > The original vim version used the notation \$1 instead of $1. > > I'm worried that the emacs version might need the backslash. > > What does the backslash mean? Is it necessary? > > I found the answer myself. The backslash is to leave the > evaluation of the argument to the 'eval' execution. > And another question arose. Why do we use eval? > What is the difference from running it directly like below? > $editor -q $1 The value of $editor is not a single program name, but is itself a shell command. So you could imagine: git config core.editor "some_command --with --args" or even more complicated shell hackery. From within Git, we'd run it as: sh -c "some_command --with --args" but when you are in a shell already, "eval" is a more efficient way of doing the same. -Peff