All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: Linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"regressions@lists.linux.dev" <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Christian Brauner (Microsoft)" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Pierre Labastie <pierre.labastie@neuf.fr>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [regression, bisected] Bug 216738 - Adding O_APPEND to O_RDWR with fcntl(fd, F_SETFL) does not work on overlayfs
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2022 17:03:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3+jz5CVA9S+h2+b@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2505800d-8625-dab0-576a-3a0221954ba3@leemhuis.info>

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 04:47:56PM +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker speaking.
> 
> I noticed a regression report in bugzilla.kernel.org. As many (most?)
> kernel developer don't keep an eye on it, I decided to forward it by
> mail. Quoting from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216738 :
> 
> >  Pierre Labastie 2022-11-24 14:53:33 UTC
> > 
> > Created attachment 303287 [details]
> > C program for reproducing the bug
> > 
> > Not sure this is the right place to report this, but at least the offending commit
> 
> [offending commit is 164f4064ca8 ("keep iocb_flags() result cached in
> struct file"), as specified in the "Kernel Version:" field in bugzilla]

So basically we have this
static int ovl_change_flags(struct file *file, unsigned int flags)
{
        struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
        int err;

        flags &= OVL_SETFL_MASK;

        if (((flags ^ file->f_flags) & O_APPEND) && IS_APPEND(inode))
                return -EPERM;

        if ((flags & O_DIRECT) && !(file->f_mode & FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT))
                return -EINVAL;

        if (file->f_op->check_flags) {
                err = file->f_op->check_flags(flags);
                if (err)
                        return err;
        }

        spin_lock(&file->f_lock);
        file->f_flags = (file->f_flags & ~OVL_SETFL_MASK) | flags;
        spin_unlock(&file->f_lock);

        return 0;
}
open-coding what setfl() would've done, without updating ->f_iocb_flags...
Not hard to deal with...

I could pick it in vfs.git #fixes, or Miklos could put it through his tree.
Miklos, which way would you prefer that to go?

[PATCH] update ->f_iocb_flags when ovl_change_flags() modifies ->f_flags

ovl_change_flags() is an open-coded variant of fs/fcntl.c:setfl() and it got
missed by 164f4064ca81e "keep iocb_flags() result cached in struct file";
the same change applies there.

Reported-by: Pierre Labastie <pierre.labastie@neuf.fr>
Fixes: 164f4064ca81e "keep iocb_flags() result cached in struct file"
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/file.c b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
index a1a22f58ba18..dd688a842b0b 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/file.c
@@ -96,6 +96,7 @@ static int ovl_change_flags(struct file *file, unsigned int flags)
 
 	spin_lock(&file->f_lock);
 	file->f_flags = (file->f_flags & ~OVL_SETFL_MASK) | flags;
+	file->f_iocb_flags = iocb_flags(file);
 	spin_unlock(&file->f_lock);
 
 	return 0;

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-24 17:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-24 15:47 [regression, bisected] Bug 216738 - Adding O_APPEND to O_RDWR with fcntl(fd, F_SETFL) does not work on overlayfs Thorsten Leemhuis
2022-11-24 17:03 ` Al Viro [this message]
2022-11-24 20:33   ` Miklos Szeredi
2022-11-25  4:09     ` Al Viro
2022-11-25  7:38   ` Thorsten Leemhuis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y3+jz5CVA9S+h2+b@ZenIV \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=pierre.labastie@neuf.fr \
    --cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.