From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE692C4332F for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 16:16:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238450AbiKOQQ0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2022 11:16:26 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36794 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229624AbiKOQQY (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Nov 2022 11:16:24 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [5.9.137.197]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBFC121269; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 08:16:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ea9733e7da329c23fffea6a903.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ea:9733:e7da:329c:23ff:fea6:a903]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 514891EC02AD; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 17:16:22 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1668528982; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=moL1gKMqW4R5g57WXDtF4yiJKN98vtk7xkszGsGO4fo=; b=Qp6eHo7w65ZguQTm1d5QBmuay+l+StBUSN5myLyBorYAC9rFELw6/nlgktUathZDGZECMx 8/PglA5XevPaPFefcl7qWMdWcdKAU2wPCmwBDykMC1s/TnbhiN/mhJG6wTuM/yvd/kde4L TfJFRtfb4Wt3WwoFB7GmxC8UitS6y54= Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 17:16:17 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Sean Christopherson Cc: Xiaoyao Li , Jiaxi Chen , kvm@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, ndesaulniers@google.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, peterz@infradead.org, jpoimboe@kernel.org, chang.seok.bae@intel.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com, babu.moger@amd.com, jmattson@google.com, sandipan.das@amd.com, tony.luck@intel.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, keescook@chromium.org, nathan@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] x86: KVM: Move existing x86 CPUID leaf [CPUID_7_1_EAX] to kvm-only leaf Message-ID: References: <20221110015252.202566-1-jiaxi.chen@linux.intel.com> <20221110015252.202566-2-jiaxi.chen@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 03:29:45PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Heh, are any of the bits you believe Intel will add publicly documented? :-) > > LAM could be scattered, but if more bits are expected that's probably a waste of > time and effort. I'm being told the bigger part of that word is going to be used for either kernel or KVM bits so we might as well use it the "normal" way instead of doing KVM-only or scattered bits after all. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette